My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7332
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7332
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:30 PM
Creation date
5/17/2009 11:11:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7332
Author
Valdez, R. A., et al.
Title
Final Report Habitat Suitability Index Curves for Endangered Fishes of the Upper Colorado River Basin.
USFW Year
1987.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
191
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />The species experts involved in this study raised many questions <br />concerning the use of the existing temperature model simulations and physical <br />habi tat/hydraulic simulations. Most of the concern has resulted from the. <br />independent nature by which the research activities have been carried out and a <br />general lack of understanding of the integration of information from the <br />hydrology, temperature, habitat, and species components. The concerns of the <br />species experts have led to a series of recommendations which should now drive <br />future instream flow activities. Discussions between the fishery researchers <br />and those responsible for the hydrology, temperature ,and physical habitat <br />simulations must now take place and be integrated. on-the-ground sampling <br />procedures must be designed to assure complete compatibility among the various <br />models. <br /> <br />Upper-level managers and decisionmakers must be patient and understand <br />that these mid-course adjustments are an important part of the process and are <br />to be expected given the meager understanding of the life history and habitat <br />requirements of these fishes when the modeling effort was initiated. However, <br />enough knowledge has been gained by the fisheries researchers to guide the <br />water routing, temperature, and physical habi tat simulation efforts. <br />Therefore, immediate attention should be given to the following: <br /> <br />1. Hydrology modelers should meet with the fishery researchers to determine <br />at what critical points weekly or even daily flow time steps are needed <br />and for what periods of the year. <br /> <br />2. This should be followed by interaction with the temperature modelers to <br />provide the capability for weekly and daily temperature simulations. <br /> <br />3. The existing physical habitat sampling sites should be modified to reflect <br />the habitat needs that are critical at those sites and in some cases the <br />existing sites may need to be completely abandoned and replaced. New <br />microhabi tat sampling procedures which are compatible with the habitat <br />needs of the fish as defined by the fishery researchers, must be described <br />and implemented immediately. <br /> <br />4. The database produced from this contract effort should be continually <br />updated and the sampling and research efforts rescoped to ensure that <br />habitat suitability information is of the highest quality and is applied <br />in a valid, scientifically supportable manner. <br /> <br />Clair B. Stalnaker <br />Chief, Aquatic Systems Branch <br />National Ecology Center <br />U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service <br />Fort Collins, Colorado <br /> <br />iii <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.