Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />1. a water routing model for the basin; <br /> <br />2. a water temperature simulation model for the basin; <br /> <br />3. hydraulic simulations at selected river cross sections important to <br />the life history of the endangered fishes; and <br /> <br />4. quantitative criteria describing the physical habitat requirements of <br />the endangered fishes. <br /> <br />Since 1984, data have been collected and experience has been gained in <br />understanding each of the activities noted above. Integration and filling the <br />data gaps, which will constitute the next phase, cannot be accomplished until <br />certain basic information is gathered and concepts are developed and verified <br />within these four activities. Numbers one and four are the principal drivers <br />of any successful integrated basinwide analysis. Once water movement <br />throughout the system and the habitat needs of the key life stages of the <br />endangered fishes are described, then, and only then, can items two and three <br />be fine-tuned to match the outputs of one and four. <br /> <br />Considerable work has been done by the hydrology group toward meeting the <br />objectives of number one (i.e., the stream routing model HYDROSS has been used <br />and modified to describe the upper basin and water delivery through all the <br />specified riverine habitat areas identified). The ability to predict flow <br />condi tions at various points wi thin the basin using a monthly time step has <br />been achieved to the general satisfaction of the hydrological community. <br /> <br />It is the purpose of thi s report to focus on item number four, a <br />description of the physical habitat requirements of the endangered fishes of <br />the Upper Colorado River system. Considerable data have been collected since <br />the mid-1970's describing the physical conditions present where these fishes <br />were captured. However, most of this has been incidental to general ecological <br />studies of the life history, distribution, and abundance of the fish species. <br />General disagreement as to the degree of certainty with which the habitat <br />requirements were known for these endangered species led the Fish and Wildlife <br />Service to award a contract for the purpose of: (1) bringing together all the <br />known habitat information into a common database; (2) analyzing and summarizing <br />those data; (3) convening a panel of species experts to evaluate the existing <br />information and develop habitat suitability criteria for those habitat <br />parameters and species life stages for which sufficient data and knowledge <br />existed. This document reports that process and the status of the information <br />and understanding of the habitat needs of the Colorado River endangered fishes. <br />The important next step is to focus ongoing Colorado River fishery research <br />toward improving the understanding of habitat needs for those life stages which <br />this report shows are not well known, and collecting data in such a manner that <br />allows for valid habitat suitability criteria to be developed. For this reason, <br />the habitat suitability curves presented in this document are considered <br />interim curves and most surely will be refined as a result of ongoing research <br />programs. The immediate benefit of this particular exercise should be the <br />refinement of the temperature simulation effort and the description of <br />microhabitats and sampling procedures for hydraulic simulations. <br /> <br />ii <br />