My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJC02291 (2)
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
DayForward
>
1001-2000
>
PROJC02291 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 11:18:11 AM
Creation date
2/2/2009 11:10:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C150280
Contractor Name
Park Center Water District
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
0
County
Fremont
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Approval Letter
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Park Center Water District <br />January 20, 2009 -Updated January Z7, 2009 <br />Page 3 of 6 <br />Park Center Water District <br />Agenda Item l la <br />The District was created by election in 1968 to provide domestic water to residences in the North Canon <br />City area. The District is a Title 37 Special District with its office located in Canon City, Colorado. It <br />currently serves approximately 4,000 residents. The District operates as an Enterprise and is governed <br />by a five member Board of Directors and is funded through user fees and tap fees. The Board has the <br />ability to set user fees. <br />Water Rights <br />In addition to leasing well water, the District owns surface water rights through 614 shares in the Canon <br />Heights Irrigation and Reservoir Company. In an average year, one share of stock is equivalent to one <br />acre-foot of water. <br />Project Description <br />In order to address the well failure and continue providing water to its users, the District considered the <br />following options: <br />1. Take no-action; <br />2. Repair the existing well casing; <br />3. Redrill the well; <br />Alternative No. 1-The no action alternative of discontinuing the lease between BLM and the District <br />was considered unacceptable to the District because it is reliant on the well and could not provide <br />enough water to its users without the well. <br />Alternative No. 2 -The District and the BLM both contacted contractors to inspect the well to determine <br />if it could be rehabilitated. Both contractors recommended redrilling the 80 year old well. Contractors <br />believed that sliplining the artesian well was too dangerous and could result in complete well failure. <br />Selected Alternative No. 3 -The District (along with the support from the BLM) selected the well <br />redrilling alternative because it knows the geography of the area, and the size and depth of the aquifer; <br />therefore, it believes this will best solve the existing problem. The BLM will be assisting the District by <br />obtaining all permits required for the project. <br />The District anticipates awarding a contract for the drilling in February 2009 with work commencing by <br />the end of the month. It expects work to be complete by the end of March 2009. <br />Financial Analysis <br />Table 1 shows a summary of the financial aspects of the loan request. The District qualifies for the low- <br />income municipal interest rate of 3.5% for a 30 year term. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.