Laserfiche WebLink
ensure that all technical, scientific, and engineering resources for this Project <br />benefit from a consistent approach to the restoration work on all reaches of the <br />Rio Grande. This proposal reflects a coordinated approach to funding as well, <br />with the Foundation seeking matching furls to those obtained from the 2008 EPA <br />319 Funds. In addition, the Foundation is combining the contributions of <br />landowners with external technical and funding sources to implement the Project. <br />This results in a very strong likelihood that this water activitywill be implemented, <br />providing a greater than 1:1 leverage of the funds requested. <br />• This Project therefore demonstrates a creative and proactive funding strategy in <br />which the Foundation's request for SB-179 funding plays a vital and enabling role. <br />• If this proposal is not funded, the Project will not happen. <br />d. Urgency of need: <br />This Project addresses the high priority mitigation measures identified in the 2001 Study to <br />improve the historical functions of the river. These functions include: <br />• Maintenance of channel capacity and overbank capacity <br />• Protection of channel and floodplain from damage by flooding <br />• Maintenance of riparian habitat and fisheries <br />• Delivery of Rio Grande Compact commitments <br />• Access to river for water diversion <br />If mitigation measures are not taken to address these issues as the opportunities present <br />themselves then the condition of the Rio Grande in Colorado will continue to deteriorate. <br />The 2001 Study has determined that the deterioration in water quality and fishery conditions is <br />due to increased sediment loading. These increased sediment loads are caused by unstable <br />stream banks, resulting from a deteriorated condition of the riparian zone of the river. <br />The 2001 Study divided the river into thirty (30) sub-reaches. The location of the potential <br />project sites for this Project lie within the E4, E5, and F1 sub-reaches (See Appendix A, for a <br />more detailed description of the condition of these reaches). The condition of the riparian <br />corridor was analyzed with respect to vegetation, re-vegetation, human impact, agricultural <br />disturbance, terrestrial wildlife habitat, and aquatic habitat. Results from the analyses gave the <br />three sub-reaches scores of 15/30,13/30, and 7/30 respectively, indicating that riparian zone <br />conditions in these sub-reaches is categorized as "poor." <br />• Human impacts, including unrestricted grazing practices, have contributed to instability in <br />riparian zones and stream banks, resulting in a significantly modified river system which <br />precludes the river ever returning to a natural stream. These impacts have adversely <br />affected the sites proposed for riparian stabilization. <br />• Due to riverbank instability and poor riparian conditions, the historical functions of the Rio <br />Grande is undergoing deterioration which must be remedied as soon as possible by <br />implementing the measures described in this Project. <br />• Unless the projects proposed in the 2001 Study are implemented there will be continued <br />deterioration in all the functions of the Rio Grande, diminishing the Foundation's capacity