Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />logic. This document should clearly separate analysis logic from data <br />preprocessing that may have been done, so that a robust software algorithm <br />can be implemented. An overview of functionality is as follows: <br />a. Allow users to select a water right date (and corresponding <br />administration number) to analyze, either by selecting from an <br />existing list of water rights, or by entering adate/administration <br />number. <br />b. Allow users to select a location above which the analysis should <br />occur, either corresponding to the structure of a selected water <br />right (previous step), or by selecting a structure on the river above <br />which a new right is being evaluated. <br />c. Select the water district for the analysis (note that in a full-scale <br />implementation this selection should not be necessary because the <br />upstream/downstream order would properly determine <br />structures/rights in the analysis). Selection of a water district may <br />be necessary to simplify water right/structure selections and to <br />mimic the Leonard Rice tool. <br />d. Select the years of historical calls to analyze (or analyze all). <br />e. Select the type of year for report output (calendar, water, <br />irrigation). <br />f. The results will consist of the following: <br />i. A monthly time series indicating the number of days that <br />the analyzed right is called out in each month of the <br />analysis. <br />ii. A monthly time series indicating the number of days that <br />the analyzed right is in priority in each month of the <br />analysis. <br />iii. A chronological list for each day of the analysis indicating <br />the right that calls out the right being analyzed (or "free <br />river" if not called out). This maybe implemented as a <br />daily time series of administration numbers (99999.00000 <br />for free river). <br />The time series will be made available in the standard time series <br />view components (graph, table, report) to allow saving in various <br />formats. The report will be viewable and can be saved to a text <br />file. <br />3. Provide a short memorandum to the State recommending activities that need <br />to be performed to fully implement the tool and meet with State staff to <br />discuss the task results and recommendations. These recommendations will <br />be based on experience gained implementing the tool. In particular, the <br />memorandum will discuss: <br />a. The methodology to determine an upstream/downstream order that <br />can be stored in HydroBase. The existing stream mile data in <br />HydroBase are limited and do not indicate how tributaries should <br />be treated. Defining an automated procedure to determine order <br />9 <br />