My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CRDSS_Task1_15-2_WaterRightsPlanningModelEvaluationCriteria
CWCB
>
Decision Support Systems
>
DayForward
>
CRDSS_Task1_15-2_WaterRightsPlanningModelEvaluationCriteria
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/26/2011 8:32:33 AM
Creation date
7/11/2008 9:34:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Decision Support Systems
Title
CRDSS Task 1.15-2 - Water Rights Planning Model - Model Evaluation Criteria
Description
In order to select a suitable water rights planning model that will address the goals and objectives of the CRDSS, an objective methodology to evaluate model functionality and performance was developed.
Decision Support - Doc Type
Task Memorandum
Date
5/10/1994
DSS Category
Surface Water
DSS
Colorado River
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Contract/PO #
C153658, C153727, C153752
Grant Type
Non-Reimbursable
Bill Number
SB92-87, HB93-1273, SB94-029, HB95-1155, SB96-153, HB97-008
Prepared By
Riverside Technology inc.
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
TABLE 2 <br />LEVEL TWO DECISION CRITERIA FOR <br />EVALUATION OF THE CRDSS WATER RIGHTS PLANNING MODEL <br />PART 1: DATA INPUT AND OUTPUT CONCEPTS <br />1. Pre- and post-processors, interface programs <br />2. Water rights priorities <br />3. Delayed return flows <br />4. Reservoir operation accounting <br /> a. Multiple priorities <br /> b. Multiple ownerships <br /> c. Reservoir rule curves <br />d. Area-capacity relations <br />5. Physical network setup related to required number of nodes and links <br />6. Input organization related to the following: <br /> a. Free format vs. fixed format <br /> b. Single file vs. multiple files <br /> c. Ease of interpretation <br />7. Flexibility in assigning demands: <br />a. Historic diversions & storage <br /> b. Simulated demands ("what if" scenario) <br /> c. Consumptive use as demand input <br />8. Output organization related to the following: <br /> a. Ability to echo current input settings <br /> b. Ease of interpretation <br /> c. Flexibility in selecting summarized output <br /> d. Error messages, comments & debugging information <br />e.Summary of data required for mass balance check <br />3 <br />A275 05.10.94 1.15-2 Fosha, Hyre <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.