My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Final.HCI.Report.HDR
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
Final.HCI.Report.HDR
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/28/2011 12:13:56 PM
Creation date
6/11/2008 9:59:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Title
Hydro-Climate Index Study
Prepared For
CWCB & Colorado River WCD
Prepared By
HDR Engineering Inc.
Date
12/28/2007
County
Statewide
State
CO
Country
USA
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Scientific Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
t <br />4 <br />a <br />gure 1-i. Relationship of the Mar-May. Foo vs. uistrict 32 Jun. -Isep. Basin Avg. Yrecip. <br />lvbr -1v1ay PDO vs. July -Sept Precipitaiton in District 32 <br />(% of normal) <br />• <br />• ♦ <br />♦ <br />2.50 -2.00 -1.50 -1.00 -0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 <br />Mar -May PDO Value <br />D - Summer Precipitation — Days with 0.10" or treater (Mav 1- September 15 <br />For `growing season' days the number of days with 0.10" or greater was limited <br />to examining two stations with sufficient daily data for, Fort Lewis and Cortez. <br />A look at the calculated relationships reveals a couple of interesting items. For <br />Cortez, there was some relationship with the MEI/SOI (El Nino) and the number of `wet' <br />(> 0.10 ") days with El Nino years exhibiting a propensity for more days with moisture. <br />An example of this relationship with respect to Cortez can be seen in Figure 14. El Nino <br />years have a tendency to at least deliver a normal /near normal amount of days in the <br />basin with some scatter in La Nina year. <br />At Fort Lewis, the ENSO relationships were not as clearly apparent as they were <br />in Cortez however, the relationship with the AMO was worth noting as positive years <br />indicating that a normal number of `wet' days reach the average range with a number of <br />notable lack of `wet' days at the station. <br />Given the mixed results with two stations that appear to be in relatively close in <br />proximity both variable might be considered if attempting to make a determination on the <br />potential for `wet' days in the area for spring. Also, a little more analysis might be <br />undertaken at a future date to refine these relationships. <br />21 <br />♦ <br />• <br />♦ ♦ <br />• <br />__ --- _ _ ____________________________?__ <br />♦ <br />• <br />♦ <br />♦r <br />2.50 -2.00 -1.50 -1.00 -0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 <br />Mar -May PDO Value <br />D - Summer Precipitation — Days with 0.10" or treater (Mav 1- September 15 <br />For `growing season' days the number of days with 0.10" or greater was limited <br />to examining two stations with sufficient daily data for, Fort Lewis and Cortez. <br />A look at the calculated relationships reveals a couple of interesting items. For <br />Cortez, there was some relationship with the MEI/SOI (El Nino) and the number of `wet' <br />(> 0.10 ") days with El Nino years exhibiting a propensity for more days with moisture. <br />An example of this relationship with respect to Cortez can be seen in Figure 14. El Nino <br />years have a tendency to at least deliver a normal /near normal amount of days in the <br />basin with some scatter in La Nina year. <br />At Fort Lewis, the ENSO relationships were not as clearly apparent as they were <br />in Cortez however, the relationship with the AMO was worth noting as positive years <br />indicating that a normal number of `wet' days reach the average range with a number of <br />notable lack of `wet' days at the station. <br />Given the mixed results with two stations that appear to be in relatively close in <br />proximity both variable might be considered if attempting to make a determination on the <br />potential for `wet' days in the area for spring. Also, a little more analysis might be <br />undertaken at a future date to refine these relationships. <br />21 <br />♦ <br />• <br />• <br />♦ <br />• <br />♦ <br />♦r <br />♦ <br />2.50 -2.00 -1.50 -1.00 -0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 <br />Mar -May PDO Value <br />D - Summer Precipitation — Days with 0.10" or treater (Mav 1- September 15 <br />For `growing season' days the number of days with 0.10" or greater was limited <br />to examining two stations with sufficient daily data for, Fort Lewis and Cortez. <br />A look at the calculated relationships reveals a couple of interesting items. For <br />Cortez, there was some relationship with the MEI/SOI (El Nino) and the number of `wet' <br />(> 0.10 ") days with El Nino years exhibiting a propensity for more days with moisture. <br />An example of this relationship with respect to Cortez can be seen in Figure 14. El Nino <br />years have a tendency to at least deliver a normal /near normal amount of days in the <br />basin with some scatter in La Nina year. <br />At Fort Lewis, the ENSO relationships were not as clearly apparent as they were <br />in Cortez however, the relationship with the AMO was worth noting as positive years <br />indicating that a normal number of `wet' days reach the average range with a number of <br />notable lack of `wet' days at the station. <br />Given the mixed results with two stations that appear to be in relatively close in <br />proximity both variable might be considered if attempting to make a determination on the <br />potential for `wet' days in the area for spring. Also, a little more analysis might be <br />undertaken at a future date to refine these relationships. <br />21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.