My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Final.HCI.Report.HDR
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
Final.HCI.Report.HDR
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/28/2011 12:13:56 PM
Creation date
6/11/2008 9:59:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Title
Hydro-Climate Index Study
Prepared For
CWCB & Colorado River WCD
Prepared By
HDR Engineering Inc.
Date
12/28/2007
County
Statewide
State
CO
Country
USA
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Scientific Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Figure 12. Relationship between the March -May MEI and the number of days with 0.10" of <br />precipitation or greater in the May 1- Sept 15 period. <br />Jan -May MEI vs. Days with 0.10" of precipitation or greater for Cortez for the period of <br />May 1 to Sept 15 (Average —12 days) <br />♦ <br />♦ <br />♦ <br />O ♦ ♦ <br />.t f <br />3s <br />a <br />♦ N <br />-3.00 -2.50 -2.00 -1.50 -1.00 -0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 <br />Jan -Mar MEI Value <br />E - Stream flow (April — September) <br />For this critical component of the hydrological cycle, the District boundaries were <br />not so much adhered to as there was a HCI- stream flow analysis of the three major <br />drainages in this District. The stream gage points that were analyzed were the San Juan <br />River at Pagosa Springs, the Animas at Durango and the Dolores River at Rico. All of <br />these rivers do not effectively `merge' in the Colorado River system until they have left <br />the state boundaries and were analyzed separately. <br />San Juan at Pnosa Sprints <br />An analysis of the leading mode HCI relationships do indicate that the ENSO <br />HCI's maintain a general El Nino — more runoff/ vice versa relationship. However, the <br />AMO was a statistically more robust relationship than the ENSO variable. The initial <br />thought is to this is that El Nino years still have a higher level of scatter in parts of the <br />relationship. Examples of this relationship are presented in Figures 15 and 16. <br />22 <br />♦♦ <br />E - Stream flow (April — September) <br />For this critical component of the hydrological cycle, the District boundaries were <br />not so much adhered to as there was a HCI- stream flow analysis of the three major <br />drainages in this District. The stream gage points that were analyzed were the San Juan <br />River at Pagosa Springs, the Animas at Durango and the Dolores River at Rico. All of <br />these rivers do not effectively `merge' in the Colorado River system until they have left <br />the state boundaries and were analyzed separately. <br />San Juan at Pnosa Sprints <br />An analysis of the leading mode HCI relationships do indicate that the ENSO <br />HCI's maintain a general El Nino — more runoff/ vice versa relationship. However, the <br />AMO was a statistically more robust relationship than the ENSO variable. The initial <br />thought is to this is that El Nino years still have a higher level of scatter in parts of the <br />relationship. Examples of this relationship are presented in Figures 15 and 16. <br />22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.