SPDSS_Task91_MapIrrigationDistributionSystems_20070109

Home Browse Search

MEMO -TASK 91 Table 5. Percentage of Ditch Companies Met for Final Review District Percent of Ditch Companies met in Initial Meetin s Percent of Ditch Companies Met in Follow-Up Meetin s District 1 100% 83% District 2 99% 50% District 3 99% 66% District 4 100% 60% District 5 97% 40% Dlstrlet 6 100% 100% District 7 100% 25% District 8 100% 25% District 9 100% 20% District 23 Met with WC Only Met with WC Only District 47 Met with WC Only Met with WC Only District 48 Met with WC Only Met with WC Only District 64 100% 50% District 80 Met with WC Only Met with WC Only Total The final review meeting with the ditch companies was beneficial for several reasons, including: ensuring that the edits performed were correct; questioning areas that were still unclear after the first meeting; clarifying issues between neighboring ditch companies; and allowing ditch companies to approve the maps and the acreage in their service area. The maps were very accurate at this stage and few edits were made. Most ditch companies were very pleased with the product. Any corrections or notes made on the maps during the final review period were edited in the digital data and checked by the personnel that attended the meeting. Notes from the final review meetings and any edits performed are recorded in the `Ditch Company Contact Database'. Table 6 provides a summary of all the contacts or activities performed by RTi with the ditch companies in Division 1. Table 6. Summary of Contacts and Activities with Ditch Companies RTi Activity With Ditch Company Activity Count First Date Of Activity Last Date Of Activity Contact Letter 250 Jan-04 April-OS Telephone Contact 442 29-Jan-04 1-Dec-OS Irrigation Meeting 278 04-Feb-04 07-Dec-OS Final Review Letter 120 20-Sep-04 Feb-06 Final Irrigation Meeting 50 19-Aug-04 09-Feb-06 Follow-up edits 242 10-Feb-04 March-06 After completing final review and edits from the water user meetings, an internal review of the data was performed. The final assignment of wells to parcels was completed, as described in Section 2.3.2. All parcels were reviewed to ensure that there was a water source and crop type assigned to them. The topology of the parcels was evaluated and overlaps were corrected. Finally, the parcels were formatted into a shapefile consistent with the CDSS and HydroBase format. A description of the CDSS parcel format is presented in Appendix E. Page 12 of 55 ~R~yersfde FecAno[o`(!~Y lnc. 4'JaYer Resourer..s Errgi~ecr:np an~i L'ansuFlrnd