Laserfiche WebLink
MEMO 89.2 -APPENDIX D <br />Table D. 3. Error Matrix of Irrigated Lands Classification After Revised Thresholdinglz, is <br />Reference Parcels <br />.~. <br />U <br />S. <br />a <br />i." <br />O <br />U <br />Zi. <br />.~ <br />U <br />an <br />.~ <br />s, <br /> °~~' o <br />r ~ <br /> <br />r-) <br />b~A ,~ <br />~ +, <br />~ ~ <br />U <br />Categories ~ ~~ ~ c o '~ ~ <br /> ~ O ~ O S. <br /> Z ~ ~ <br /> <br />Irrigated Lands 432 190 622 30.5% 69.5% <br />Non-irrigated Lands 24 266 290 8.3% 91.7% <br />Total 456 456 <br />Error of Omission 5.3% 41.7% 912 <br />Producer's Accuracy 94.7% 58.3% <br />Overall Accuracy = <br />90% Confidence Interval= <br />95% Confidence Interval= <br />99% Confidence Interval= <br />Overall KIA = <br />KIA per Category <br />Category <br />Irrigated Land <br />Non-irrigated Lands <br />76.54% +/- 2.30% _ <br />76.54% +/- 2.75% _ <br />76.54% +/- 3.62% _ <br />KAPPA INDEX OF AGREEMENT (KIA) <br />KIA <br />0.83 <br />0.39 <br />iz Accuracy assessment estimate using FSA data <br />is Accuracy assessment corresponds to Landsat frame 33/32, representing 89% of irrigated lands in SPDSS <br />74.23%to 78.84% <br />73.78% to 79.29% <br />72.91% to 80.16% <br />Page 40 of 45 ~R~versfde FecAnotogy, fnc. <br />4'JaYer Resources Errgi~ecr:np an~i CansuFlrnp <br />