Laserfiche WebLink
MEMO 89.2 -APPENDIX D <br />Table D. 4. Error Matrix of Irrigated Lands Classification After Initial Thresholdingla, is <br />Reference Parcels <br />.~. <br />U <br />S. <br />a <br />i." <br />O <br />U <br />W <br />.~ <br />U <br />an <br />.~ <br />s, <br /> U <br /> ~ <br /> <br />~ O <br />4-i ~+ <br /> <br />U <br /> r-) b <br />A ,~ ~ ~ ~ <br />Categories ~ .~ ~ <br />a o <br />H o ~~ <br />~ ~ <br /> ~ <br />W ~ <br /> ~ ~-~ ~ ~ <br /> <br />Irrigated Lands 445 277 722 38.4% 61.6% <br />Non-irrigated Lands 11 179 190 5.8% 94.2% <br />Total 456 456 <br />Error of Omission 2.4% 60.7% 912 <br />Producer's Accuracy 97.6% 39.3% <br />Overall Accuracy = <br />90% Confidence Interval= <br />95% Confidence Interval= <br />99% Confidence Interval= <br />Overall KIA = <br />KIA per Category <br />Category <br />Irrigated Land <br />Non-irrigated Lands <br />68.42% +/- 2.52% _ <br />68.42% +/- 3.02% _ <br />68.42% +/- 3.97% _ <br />KAPPA INDEX OF AGREEMENT (KIA) <br />KIA <br />0.23 <br />0.88 <br />14 Accuracy assessment estimate using FSA data <br />i5 Accuracy assessment corresponds to Landsat frame 33/32, representing 89% of irrigated lands in SPDSS <br />65.90% to 70.95% <br />65.40% to 71.44% <br />64.45% to 72.39% <br />Page 41 of 45 ~Rlversfde FecAnotogy, fnc. <br />4'JaYer Resources Errgi~ecr:np an~i CansuFlrnp <br />