Laserfiche WebLink
MEMO 89.2 -APPENDIX D <br />Table D. 2. Error Matrix of Final Irrigated Lands Classification After Photointerpretation and Edits from <br />User Informationlo,u <br />Reference Parcels <br />.~. <br />U <br />S. <br />a <br />i." <br />O <br />U <br />W <br />.~ <br />U <br />an <br />.~ <br />s, <br /> <br />~ <br />O <br />4 U <br />~+ <br /> <br />r-) <br />b~A ,~ <br />~ -i <br />~ ~ <br />U <br />Categories ~ .~ ~ o o '~ ~ <br /> ' <br />a H ~ ~ <br />W ~ <br /> ~ ~-~ ~ ~ <br /> <br />Irrigated Lands 452 31 483 6.4% 93.6% <br />Non-irrigated Lands 4 425 429 0.9% 99.1% <br />Total 456 456 <br />Error of Omission 0.9% 6.8% 912 <br />Producer's Accuracy 99.1% 93.2% <br />Overall Accuracy = <br />90% Confidence Interval= <br />95% Confidence Interval= <br />99% Confidence Interval= <br />Overall KIA = <br />KIA per Category <br />Category <br />Irrigated Land <br />Non-irrigated Lands <br />96.16% +/- 1.04% _ <br />96.16% +/- 1.25% _ <br />96.16% +/- 1.64% _ <br />KAPPA INDEX OF AGREEMENT (KIA) <br />KIA <br />0.98 <br />0.87 <br />10 Accuracy assessment estimate using FSA data <br />i i Accuracy assessment corresponds to Landsat frame 33/32, representing 89% of irrigated lands in SPDSS <br />95.12% to 97.21% <br />94.92% to 97.41% <br />94.52% to 97.80% <br />Page 39 of 45 ~R~versfde FecAnotogy, fnc. <br />4'JaYer Resources Errgi~ecr:np an~i CansuFlrnp <br />