Colorado - Roaring Fork Watershed Plan Phase II_Application

Home Browse Search

. .. .. ............................... .. . such implementation measures and list them in order of priority. Likewise, reconuraendationsfoy rnanitoring of water quality and quantity may include :measures that are not currently within the jurisdiction of an existing government or agency. This Task will identify such measures and list ~.em in order of priority taking into account such elements as cost, j~sdiction and feasibility. Task 7 Reconunendationsfor Further Stud The State of the watershed Report and the tasks described above will undaubted.ly reveal data gaps and areas where further research is needed to fully understand local water resources. This Task will entail defining those gaps and recam~mending further study, prioritized as to its urgency and usefulness. Further study will be generally def~.ed and listed to provide a basis for ongoing work on watershed issues and analysis. Task S Cam nation of watershed Plan Publishin and Presentation This Task will consist of compiling the findings, lists and accompanying narrative described . above, publishing it in an attractive and easily-read form and presenting it to local governments and water agencies as bath a draft and a final product. This Task will involve in-person presentations to those groups using visual aids and allowing for discussion and a~n.endment to the greatest passible extent. The product of this Task will be a final document. ~. Personnne Key Personnel involved in this project will include the following: Mark Fuller, Director, Ruedi Water and Power Authority :Mr. Fuller has been the Director of the Authority since its inception ~5 years aga. ~e has worked extensively on water issues in the Roaring Fork valley and has managed and facilitated a number of water planning projects. ~e will oversee the planning process, disburse all funds and take an active role in many of the tasks noted above. Sharon Clarke, Roaring Fark Conservancy Ms. Clarke is a water Resource Specialist specializing in regional geography, Greographic Information Systems ~GTS}, water resources, and aquatic habitat. She has both a B. S. and M. S. in Geography. Before Sharon worked for the Forest Science Depar~nent at Oregon State University coordinating and conducting regional GlS analyses for aquatic ecosystems. She has been the lead writer for the State of the watershed Report, Phase 1 of the Roaring Fork ~1"atershed Plan Gwen Garcelon President H.ighlife Jnlimited Consulting Finn Ms. Carcelon is a long-time facilitator and community organizer based in Carbondale. She coordinated the public ou~each element of Phase 1 of the watershed Plan and will be retained to perform the same services for Phase ll. Qther personnel will be engaged to lend specialized expertise to the planning effort. Although these individuals or f rrms have not yet been identified they rn.ay include the follow~.g: water Attorney ~ydrologistlwater engineer wildlife Biologist Graphic Designer GISIComputer Mapping Specialist