Laserfiche WebLink
yet reviewed the Phase 1 final report and this created some difficulties for staff to reach conclusions <br />regarding the review of this Phase 2 grant application. <br />The Board will also recall that Phase 2 study application was reviewed by the Board in March 2008 and was <br />denied funding based on staff's recommendation which is summarized below. <br />Staff Recommendation from March 2008 <br />Staff has very much enjoyed working with the applicant on the first WSRA grant and appreciates the <br />challenges and opportunities that the Roaring Fork planning effort represents. Staff very much <br />supports the process of identifying and addressing consumptive and non-consumptive needs and <br />projects in the Roaring Fork Watershed. In staff s view the challenge is doing this in an inclusive and <br />balanced manner. As currently written, based on the issues identified in the discussion and issues and <br />additional needs section, and given the fact the CWCB has not been provided with a deliverable from <br />the Phase 1 grant; staff does not recommend approval of the Roaring Fork Watershed Plan Phase II <br />at this time. <br />Staff encourages the applicant to address the issues identified in this Water Activity Summary Sheet <br />and consider resubmitting the application once the issues are addressed and the report from the Phase <br />I grant is completed and provided to CWCB. <br />The applicant has redrafted the grant application to address staff's concerns in regard to conformance with <br />Section 37-75-102 Colorado Revised Statues (CRS) (the water rights protection section that was included in <br />House Bill OS-1177). <br />The applicant's redrafted language in the current application is provided below <br />Phase I of the Roaring Fork Watershed Plarr ~~~as deemed to comply ~~~ith Section 37-7~-103 <br />Colorado Revised Statutes irr the corn~se of being cn~~arded firr~rdirrg from the Water Supply Reserve <br />Account in 2006-2007. The second phase of the Watershed Plan differs from Phase I in that it <br />develops and prioritizes reconmrendations for action which could ir~rclzrde evahration of flow and f7o~~~ <br />needs. To ensure corrsistencv ~~~ith Section 37-7~-102 the Watershed Plan 's' recommendations ~a~ill <br />take into account the need to ensure protection of existing and conditional water and proper°ty rights <br />~~~hile addressing firtrrre consumptive acrd non-consumptive needs. Phase II ~~~ill consist of the <br />establishment ofplarrnirrggoals and objectives through a public process, a determination of basin- <br />~~~ide ~~~ater needs (both ~~~itlrin the basin and for out of basin users and ~~~ater• rights holders) and <br />available supplies, and recommendations intended to manage ~~~ater resources to meet the ~a~ater <br />supply needs of all ~~~ater rights holders and to maximize the benefits to the public at large. TGre <br />recommendations ofthe Plan ~~~ill be developed through a collaborative, consensus-based process of <br />in basin and out of basin interests ~~~ho rely on resorn•ces ~~~ithin the ~~~atershed. All recommended <br />aetrOrlS` 11~r1~ r'eCOgnlze the Vahdrty Of exrstrrlg 11~ater' r'lghts, the neCG'ssltV t0 COr1 fOr'17r 11~rth exrstrrlg <br />~~~ater Icnv, and the need to maintain crn•rent project yields acrd collaboratively address frrttrre needs. <br />Tire Watershed Plan is intended to provide data to support irrfornred discussion about how best to <br />conserve and enhance ~~~ater resorrr°ces and to meet both consurrrptive and rron-cons~mrptive needs. <br />That discussion ~~~i11 yield a variety of strategies, tools and methods for inrpleruentirrg the plan. At this <br />point in the process, ~~~e do not think it appropriate to impose limitations on ~~~hat those strategies, <br />etc., may include but l~~e expect them to ra~rge from support for existing programs to suggestions for <br />ne~~~ legislation, consistent ~~~ith the liruitatiorrs described here and belo~~~. Phase II of the Watershed <br />Plan 1~~ill emphasize the importance ofparrnerships, collaboration, nndti prrr~ose projects and <br />cooperation in implementing the goals of the Watershed Plarr. The irrfornration and tools developed <br />7 <br />