My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00569
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00569
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:41:00 PM
Creation date
4/24/2008 2:56:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Title
Snowpack, Cloud Seeding and the Colorado River
Date
1/1/1974
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />.1' <br /> <br />If <br />,[ <br />i <br />I <br /> <br />FOREWORD <br /> <br />Identifying needed institutional changes or innovation <br /> <br />Providing sound inputs to all parties at interest <br /> <br />Preventing a. socially destructive technology from developing <br />(an unusual but not impossible outcome) <br /> <br />The material covered in this book relates to many of these possible <br />activities. <br />This particular study is one of many at various stages <br />sponsored by the Office of Exploratory Research and Problem <br />Assessment in the Research Applications Directorate in the <br />National Science Foundation. The general goals of the NSF <br />technology assessment program are <br /> <br />To provide a substantive, comprehensive, useful input into <br />public policy formulation and decision-making with regard to <br />the application of particular technologies. <br /> <br />To explore and encourage technology assessment and the ap- <br />plication of systematic methods, techniques, protocols, and <br />approaches to complex policy-related problems <br /> <br />To encourage the growth of organizational capability to con- <br />duct impartial, comprehensive technology assessments <br /> <br />To encourage the expansion of the concept of impact analysis <br />to include the impacts of social technology, social invention, <br />and institutional change <br /> <br />SNOWPACK, CLOUD-SEEDING, AND THE COLORADO RIVER <br /> <br />economic costs and benefits or immediate implications for the <br />perpetrator or user of technology. The extension into the full <br />range of social, economic, political, international, legal, and <br />other societal impacts demands a degree of skill and sophisti- <br />cation rarely brought to the management of technology. The <br />second feature of technology assessment is its focus as a policy <br />study on informing the interested publics and the decision- <br />makers of the possible range of consequences for new actions. <br />Sound assessments should put into the hands of all interested <br />parties reliable information to help them formulate their deci- <br />sions and to generate more socially desirable management <br />strategies. Furthermore, there should be cumulative benefits <br />from making the discussions and the implementations of the <br />management of technology far more sophisticated than they <br />have been in the past. A third aspect of technology assessment is <br />the attempt to organize and draw policy guidance from both <br />what is known with some certitude and what is not known. <br />Normally one anticipates that policy flows out of knowl- <br />edge; but in the effective management of technology, viable <br />policies must flow out of both what we know and what we do <br />not know. Consequently, one may anticipate that a technology <br />assessment wi11lead to one or more of the following actions: <br /> <br />To serve the growing needs in the federal agencies for advice, <br />guidance, and assistance in technology assessment <br /> <br />To meet the mandated cooperative activities associated with <br />the formulation of the Office of Technology Assessment by the <br />Congress <br /> <br />Modifying the project or technology to reduce disbenefits or to <br />increase benefits <br /> <br />Defining a monitoring or surveillance program with regard to <br />the technology as it becomes operational <br /> <br />With regard to any particular assessment of a technology, the <br />sponsoring organization is faced by several difficulties: identi- <br />fying organizations which can adequately perform the assess- <br />ment; assuring that their methods, techniques, and strategies for <br />conducting the study are adequate; not only assuring that the <br />investigators have the widest latitude of independence, but also <br />driving them to use their independence. An effective technology <br /> <br />of <br /> <br />Stimulating research and development to <br />(a) Define risks more reliably <br />(b) Forestall anticipated negative effects <br />(c) Identify alternative methods of achieving <br />the technology <br />(d) Identify feasible corrective measures for negative effects <br /> <br />the goal <br /> <br />into <br /> <br />a technology <br /> <br />Identifying regulatory or other control needs <br /> <br />of <br /> <br />Encouraging the legislative development <br />new areas to exploit anticipated benefits <br /> <br />Iii <br />~.~ <br />r-.~ <br />, <br />lli~ <br />It"J> <br />, , <br />~ <br />.~~. <br />'.'~,T <br />Iff, <br />j . <br />, ' <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />, ',:;~ <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />II <br /> <br />PROPERTY OF <br />tAU OF REClAMAll0N <br /> <br />p <br /> <br />vii <br /> <br />vi <br /> <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.