Laserfiche WebLink
<br />814 <br /> <br />JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />elevation site (1600 m), Blue Canyon; and 3) numerical <br />simulations of the cross-barrier airflow using the two- <br />dimensional primitive equation airflow model for <br />Sierra Nevada terrain developed by Parish (1982) and <br />Waight (1984). <br />Surface D and the terrain below define a large chan- <br />nel of air flowing between Sheridan and Kingvale. <br />Within this channel, mass flux was assumed to be con- <br />served. This large channel of air was then subdivided <br />into seven smaller channels of equal pressure depth <br />(50 mb at the inflow location). The u-component in <br />each individual channel was then determined by as- <br />suming mass flux conservation within each smaller <br />channel, such that <br /> <br />Ui,j = Ui.l(LlPi,I)(Mi,jrI (3) <br /> <br />where Ui,l = u-component in flow channel i at inflow <br />boundary, Ui,j = u-component in flow channel i at <br />downward grid point} (10 km spacing), ti.Pi,I = depth <br />of flow channel i at inflow boundary (50 mb), and ti.Pi,j <br />= depth of flow channel i at downwind grid point}. <br />On occasion, a blocked surface layer (u < 2.5 m S-I) <br />was present within the Sacramento Valley. When such <br />blocked flow conditions existed in the lowest levels, the <br />integration (Eq. I) began at the top of the blocked layer <br />rather than at Psh' The profile of the terrain surface <br />was then adjusted to incorporate the region of blocked <br />flow (Fig. 3b). <br />Vertical motion was determined by computing <br /> <br />t;CC.- <br /> <br />4 =','. <br /> <br /> <br />i.: <br /> <br />5:~ -.~ ... <br /> <br />55."' ." <br /> <br />'DbO:: . <br /> <br />.5 (',(J ___ <br />W <br />0:: <br />~ 7::C. <br />(f) <br />w <br />~ .'5-: <br /> <br />... -. .. <br /> <br />. . <br />. <br /> <br />~~ :)..; <br /> <br />5~:) <br /> <br />9~'_~ T~_:~:!~_...-..- ....--:,... <br />~,~'~ -n ;~:::d~!>..../ <br />I..;-~:.: p r -~ - I - I -. r I I <br />o 20 40 60 80 <br />DISTANCE (km) <br /> <br /> Valley <br />I <br />100 120 <br /> 7 <br /> 13 <br /> <br />40\ <br /> <br />451 <br /> <br />501 <br />, ....../; <br />551 - <br /> <br />~:"',....j- <br />~--- .,~ ~~ <br /> <br />:.~ : \ i: <br />/ ~ <br /> <br />_601 <br />.c <br />.5 651 <br /> <br />w <br />~ 701 <br />(f) <br />(f) <br />~ 751 <br /><L <br /> <br />801 <br /> <br />85! <br /> <br />900.- ..' <br /> <br />950'i~ci?~~~'--- <br />1000-l~ , <br />I 3 5 <br /> <br />II <br /> <br />, <br />13 <br /> <br />, <br />9 <br /> <br />I <br />7 <br /> <br />HORIZON TAL GRI D POINT <br /> <br />FIG. 3. Flow channel configuration used to determine wind com- <br />ponents without (top) and with (bottom) the presence of a blocked <br />surface layer. Regions A-C and surface D are discussed in the text. <br />The coordinate system was aligned with the Sierra Nevada crestline <br />and chosen so that the Sierra Crest was located 100 km from the <br />origin. Sheridan was located 7 km east of the origin and Lincoln at <br />the origin. Both soundings were assumed to apply at the origin since <br />they were located well within the Sacramento Valley. <br /> <br />These two points, P650 and PI' were then connected <br />by a surface, defined in Fig. 3 as the surface D. The <br />profile of this surface was assumed to have a peak 40 <br />km upwind of the crest. This profile was chosen instead <br />of a linear profile to characterize the upstream prop- <br />agation of the primary mountain wave predicted by <br />theories of mountain airflow (e.g., Smith 1979). The <br />mean position of the airflow crest during meteorolog- <br />ical conditions typical of fixed target experiments was <br />determined by examining I) aircraft measurements of <br />equivalent potential temperature (Be) between the base <br />of the Sierra Nevada and the crestline; 2) Be analyses <br />constructed from data collected by simultaneously re- <br />leased rawinsondes at Sheridan, Kingvale, and a middle <br /> <br />VOLUME 27 <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />4 <br />E <br />"" <br /> <br />. 3 l- <br />I <br />. <.0 <br />w <br />I <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />w <br />I <br /> <br />;~ <br /> <br />w = u(ti.h/ D.x) <br /> <br />(4) <br /> <br />rl <br /> <br />where ti.h/ D.x is the slope of the flow channel between <br />grid points. Typical vertical velocities varied from 0.1 <br />m S-I over the lower foothills to 0.5 m S-I near the <br />crestline. The barrier-parallel (v) component was de- <br />termined by direct interpolation along the flow chan- <br />nels of the v-component measured at Sheridan and <br />Kingvale. Derivatives of all variables in the y (barrier <br />parallel) direction over the research area were assumed <br />to be zero. <br />Region B on Fig. 3, which included the Lake Tahoe <br />valley downwind of the crest, had no measurement <br />support to calculate wind fields. Winds in this region <br />were estimated by assuming a profile of surface D which <br />corresponded approximately to the terrain shape. The <br />profile of surface D downwind of the crestline was also <br />adjusted to account for the upstream vertical propa- <br />gation of the mountain wave associated with the <br />mountain range east of Lake Tahoe (see Fig. 3). The <br />u- and w-components of the wind in region B were <br />then determined by the methods described above. The <br />v-component was conserved in each flow channel <br />downwind of the crest. <br />Winds in region C were estimated by assuming mass <br />conservation between surface D and the 400 mb sur- <br />face. Since the 400 mb surface was assumed to be hor- <br />izontal, this assumption artificially accelerated winds <br />near the top of region C in the vicinity of the mountain <br />