Laserfiche WebLink
<br />JULY 1988 <br /> <br />RAUBER ET AL. <br /> <br />813 <br /> <br />'St <br />,=,3 <br />'" <br />1;; <br />w <br />o <br /> <br />/ <br />/ <br />",~:ft~~" <br />DRV ----:::z: ~ ~::'~Y:I;:II::.E:;alion <br /> <br />D ot] (lr00.~r:::..0)~2:~I:II~I:II:III\.\ I :(l'lA~RY <br />{::1.::/::::JII<.:::;J~:.:.?:''':'..''\Jlrl'I::IJ :'111' ~ <br />'--------v----- <br />Shallow moist zone ~ Time <br /> <br /> <br />Seeding Opportunity <br /> <br />FIG. 2. Conceptual model of a cross section through many Sierran <br />storms. Stippled areas denote relative humidities above 90%. Most <br />seedable regions determined from radiometric and aircraft observa- <br />tions are annotated. The time of passage of a complete storm can <br />vary significantly from as short as 12 to >48 h (from Reynolds and <br />Dennis 1986). <br /> <br />mountain width (-100 km). These features were not <br />well represented by a single vertical sounding at the <br />base of the mountain normally used to initialize <br />models. <br />2) Sierra Nevada storms were seldom, if ever, steady <br />state. Wind fields over the Sierra Nevada continually <br />changed in storms in response to the storm's mesoscale <br />and synoptic scale evolution. Significant changes often <br />were observed in time scales as short as 3 h. <br /> <br />By the 1984/85 season, it was recognized that si- <br />multaneous rawinsondes were required at least every <br />3 h at two sites, one near the base of the Sierra Nevada <br />Range and one near the Sierra Nevada Crest to monitor <br />changes in the wind fields associated with mesosynop- <br />tic-scale storm evolution. The valley launch sites were <br />either at Sheridan, California (60 m MSL, collocated <br />with the radar) or Lincoln, California (57 m MSL, <br />1986-87 season only). The high elevation launch site <br />was at Kingvale (1800 m MSL), which was collocated <br />with the ground microphysical measurements and <br />within the fixed target area. These soundings provided <br />measurements of the wind fields at the boundaries of <br />the seeded volume at a frequency necessary to resolve <br />changes due to the passage of synoptic-scale and me- <br />soscale features. Additional soundings were provided <br />by the research aircraft during takeoff over the valley <br />and by supplemental soundings launched at Kingvale. <br />The dual-sounding system was incorporated opera- <br />tionally for targeting in SCPP beginning in February <br />1986. <br />In this paper, the diagnostic technique developed to <br />guide aircraft to the appropriate location to target <br />seeding effects within the ARB using this dual-sounding <br />system is described. Evaluations of the parameteriza- <br />tions used to recover the wind fields across the Sierra <br />Nevada and simulate ice particle growth are presented. <br />Finally, we present a case study comparing radar echo <br />evolution within a seeded cloud region with predicted <br />particle trajectories. <br /> <br />3. Targeting methodology <br /> <br />In this section, we describe the components of the <br />targeting method used during the last 2 yr of SCPP. <br />This targeting method was designed for operational ex- <br />pediency. The program was developed for use on a <br />minicomputer, but can operate on a personal com- <br />puter. The total time required to run the program on <br />either system and relay information to the aircraft was <br />usually under 3 min. Rawinsonde data used in the <br />computations were normally available from the field <br />within 30 min after the termination of the sounding. <br />Aircraft and radiometer data were available in real <br />time. The methods presented here focus only on the <br />muItiple-rawinsonde technique that was utilized suc- <br />cessfully later in the program. <br /> <br />a. Kinematics <br /> <br />Wind speed and direction were measured in vertical <br />soundings at two locations, Sheridan or Lincoln, in the <br />Sacramento Valley, and Kingvale, near the Sierra Crest. <br />These sites were separated by 85 km. Seeding was nor- <br />mally conducted at or below the 3500 m level ( -650 <br />mb). The "target" in all cases was Kingvale. <br />The primary region where accurate winds were re- <br />quired for targeting, designated as region A on Fig. 3, <br />was bounded on the west by Sheridan, the east by <br />Kingvale and aloft approximately by 650 mb (surface <br />"D" on Fig. 3). Regions B, downwind of the crest, and <br />C, in the upper troposphere, were normally outside the <br />primary region of interest during airborne seeding ex- <br />periments. However, it was possible that particle tra- <br />jectories occasionally would fall into region B (trajec- <br />tory 2 on Fig. 3) or initiate or pass briefly into the lower <br />part of region C (trajectory 3 on Fig. 3). <br />The procedure to determine winds in each region <br />differed because of data availability. In region A, the <br />primary region of interest for the experiment, winds <br />were determined in the following way: <br />The barrier-perpendicular (u) component was de- <br />termined by assuming conservation of mass flux <br />throughout the domain A. The mass flux perpendicular <br />to the crestline below the 650 mb le:vel at Sheridan was <br />measured directly from the sounding by calculating <br /> <br />JP650 <br />Ms = g-I u(P)dp. (1) <br />Psh <br /> <br />Here, Ms is the mass flux below 650 mb at Sheridan, <br />P pressure, g gravity, and the subscripts sh and 650 <br />denott~ the surface pressure and the 650 mb pressure <br />at Sheridan. A similar integration was then performed <br />at Kingvale to determine the pressure level over King- <br />vale where the mass flux at Kingvalle, Mk, equaled Ms: <br /> <br />Ms = Mk = g-I iPt u(P)dp. (2) <br />Pkv <br /> <br />Here PI is the pressure level at Kingvale below which <br />Mk = M" and Pkv is the surface pressure at Kingvale. <br />