Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />6. SAA REFINEMENT <br /> <br />6.1 Adjustments to the Hybrid Scan and Occultation Files <br /> <br />The radar's hybrid scan strategy (O'Bannon, 1997) is primarily based on a minimum 500-foot <br />clearance of the terrain by the beam bottom. This scheme, which uses a terrain elevation file, <br />was used initially. Since it was discovered that there were still echo anomalies evident after <br />applying this scheme, a new approach was taken. Numerous cases of either widespread <br />precipitation or clear air echoes were composited for the separate tilts for all radar sites to reveal <br />these echo anomalies, which were caused by the beam striking surface targets and producing <br />persistent echo enhancement (ground clutter echoes) or persistent echo reduction (preprocessing <br />suppression from zero Doppler shift). The hybrid scan files were then constructed to specify the <br />lowest tilt that avoided such anomalies. Case studies were run with the new hybrid scan files, <br />and the files were hand-edited to remove further localized errors caused by echo anomalies. <br />These procedures, though laborious, allowed for "manual" adjustments of reflectivity in the <br />anomalous areas and the best QPE available. We call the result our empirical hybrid scan. <br /> <br />The widespread precipitation cases revealed radial streaking, signifying inadequacies in the <br />occultation file. By using azimuthal profiles of SWE, estimates were made for the dB additions <br />to particular radials beyond some appropriate range at which blockages began. The occultation <br />file was manually adjusted, and the cases were rerun until anomalies were minimized. Unlike the <br />original occultation files that attempted no correction if more than 4 dB additions were needed, <br />the new changes maintained a 4-dB correction to 230 km if a vertical blockage greater than <br />60 percent was apparent. We preferred an insufficient correction of first tilt reflectivities to <br />having the hybrid scan file stepping up to the second tilt, which overshot the tops of far range <br />echoes. In a few mountainous areas where the first tilt was totally blocked, the hybrid scan files <br />were adjusted to rise above the obstruction for the rest of the farther ranges. These changes were <br />implemented before the 2000-2001 winter season. <br /> <br />6.2 Vertical Profile of Reflectivity Correction <br /> <br />This correction and others in the remainder of section 6 were first described in Hunter et aI., <br />2001. The importance of some type of VPR correction is reinforced by the literature. Joss and <br />Waldvogel (1990) assert that VPR measurement is ". . .the main problem in using radar for <br />precipitation measurements and hydrology in operational applications." This is affirmed by <br />several researchers, including Koistinen (1991), Galli and Joss (1991), Andrieu and Creutin <br />(1991), and Smith (1990). Joss and Waldvogel (1990) reinforce the importance of <br />VPR correction by asserting that it should be done before any other adjustment, such as gauge <br />data. Hunter (1996) recapitulated these findings regarding the operational WSR-88D. The NWS <br />embarked on a VPR correction for precipitation in general in the late 1990s, as described by <br />Seo et al. (2000). <br /> <br />As described in section 4.2, Reclamation had developed a simple second-order polynomial range <br />correction. This correction was actually formulated from a mean of several VPRs (more <br />precisely vertical profiles of snowfall rate S, since that is calculated from Ze at each vertical <br /> <br />15 <br />