Laserfiche WebLink
<br />TABLE VII. --Estimate of scale changes during seeded periods with: respect to <br />non-seeded periods as computed by three statistical methods. Scale changes <br />are shown as a function of the 700 mb wind direction. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br /> With Controls Without Controls <br /> Total Sample Scale Scale <br />8tra tification Sample Size Change Change <br />(Degrees) Size Utilized Method (0/0) P- Value (0/0 ) P- Value <br />Climax I <br />210 thru 240 S 14 S 14 NPl >+200 .062 > +200 .071 <br /> NS 16 NS 16 NP2 +37 .239 +159 .109 <br /> (S9, NS9) PAR +100 .079 <br />250 thru 300 S 63 8 63 NP1 -6 .367 -29 .090 <br /> NS 73 NS 73 NP2 +2 .429 -23 .142 <br /> (S43, NS59) PAR +4 .397 <br />310 thru 350 S 25 S 25 NP1 +64 .099 +24 .251 <br /> NS 26 NS 26 NP2 +20 .323 +22 .215 <br /> (S?':l, NS?2) PAR +23 . 212 <br />o thru 200 S 18 S 18 NPl -46 .087 -3 .352 <br /> NS 16 NS 16 NP2 -31 .108 0 .496 <br /> (815, N812) PAR -25 .176 <br />Climax II <br />210 thru 240 S 6 S 6 NP1 +30 .258 <br /> NS 6 NS 6 NP2 +6 .488 <br /> (84, NS4) PAR +151 .097 <br />250 thru 300 S 32 S 32 NP1 +5 .390 -15 .261 <br /> NS 35 NS 35 NP2 +2 .436 -4 .352 <br /> (S24, NS29) PAR +5 .429 <br />310 thru 350 S 13 S 13 NP1 +45 .195 +15 .309 <br /> NS 16 NS 16 NP2 -29 .330 +6 .334 <br /> (Sll, NS14) PAR +27 .236 <br />o thru 200 S 10 S 10 NP1 -4 .421 <br /> NS 9 NS 9 NP2 -1 .448 <br /> (S10, NS6) PAR +1 .492 <br />Wolf Creek Summit <br />220 thru 270 S 74 S 63 NP1 +60 .0129 +79 .0099 <br /> NS 91 NS 81 NP2 +79 .0027 +84 ; 0035 <br /> (S45, NS59) PAR +60 .0019 <br />230 thru 250 S 44 S 39 NP1 +109 .0071 +146 .UU:)6 <br /> NS 45 NS 38 NP2 t-141 .0024 +164 ' .0006 <br /> (S28, NS28) PAR +129 .0001 <br />260 thru 360 and S 120 S 108 NP1 +10 .295 +15 .274 <br />o thru 220 NS 153 NS 143 NP2 +8 .337 -4 .460 <br /> (S67, NS92) PAR +13 .212 <br />wind speeds, since the boundary condition may be have low supply rates of cloud water due to the small <br />reached where crystals start escaping over the orographic effect and usually there would be suffi- <br />mountain barrier that would have naturally fallen on cient natural ice nuclei to convert the cloud water to <br />the E10untain summit. ice form. <br /> <br />Table IX and Table X show the <br />distribution of seeding effects with respect to the <br />700 mb and 500 mb wind speeds, respecti vely. <br />Table IX indicates decreases in snowfall for all <br />three samples when seeding the highest 700 mb wind <br />speed categories. The snowfall decreases are <br />significant at the 50/0 level for most tests at Wolf <br />Creek Summit. The seeding effect is near zero or <br />slightly negative when seeding events in the lowest <br />700 mb wind speed category. These events would <br /> <br />There is an irregular increase in <br />~ositive seeding effects as the 700 mb wind speed <br />mcreases toward the highest category. Snowfall <br />increases of about 1000/0 are observed in the Climax I <br />sample when events having 700 mb wind speeds from <br />12 mps through 15 mps are seeded. Some of the <br />tests indicate these increases to be significant at the <br />'3'/0 level. In the Wolf Creek I sample snowfall in <br />increases of over 100% are indicated when seeding <br /> <br />22 <br />