My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC12833
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1001-2000
>
WSPC12833
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:34:47 PM
Creation date
4/11/2008 9:58:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8103
Description
Preliminary Report on Water Legislation Investigation for the Arkansas River Basin
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Date
12/1/1967
Author
Coordinator of Natural Resources
Title
Preliminary Report on Water Legislation Investigations for the Arkansas River Basin
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />factors and their degree of influence on winter return flow between <br />Pueblo and La Junta. <br /> <br />-8- <br /> <br /> <br />These studies show that John Martin Reservoir had a distInct <br />effect upon return flow after it was placed in operation. They also <br />show the relationship between the amount of water pumped from wells for <br />irrigation and the amount of return flow. <br /> <br />SUGGESTED ADDITIONAL INVESTIGATIONS <br /> <br />A number of computor studies should be made if the best <br />water management plan or plans are to be developed for the Arkansas <br />River Basin in Colorado. Because of the junior priorities of irrIgation <br />wells and their adverse effect upon the senior surface water rights, It <br />is recommended that the first study be a reconstruction of the stream- <br />flow on a monthly basis with John Martin Reservoir in operation, and <br />the determination of the water supply available to the various <br />appropriators according to their vested water rights. Variations of <br />this study would include the operation of John Martin Reservoir in <br />accordance with the past practices under the Colorado-Kansas compact, <br />modification of these practices concerning del iveries in Colorado, and <br />el iminating Colorado1s obligations to deliver water to Kansas on the <br />assumption that storage would be provided in Kansas to compensate <br />Kansas for the water now obtained by that state from John Martin <br />Reservoir. Also, another variation would be studies assuming full <br />operation of the Frying Pan Arkansas Project. The recommended final <br />computor studies would include the integration of wells and ground water <br />use therefrom in conjunction with the use of surface waters to obtain <br />the greatest benefit from the State's water resources in this basin. <br />In these studies it would be assumed that winter irrigation will and <br />will not be used and that the Frying Pan Arkansas Project will and will <br />not be in operation. The studies would requIre various adjustments to <br />protect vested senior water rights. In these studies, the greatest degree <br />of regulation of excessive snowmelt flows, winter flows and return <br />flows would be made so the monthly water requirements of the various <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.