My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC12833
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1001-2000
>
WSPC12833
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:34:47 PM
Creation date
4/11/2008 9:58:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8103
Description
Preliminary Report on Water Legislation Investigation for the Arkansas River Basin
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Date
12/1/1967
Author
Coordinator of Natural Resources
Title
Preliminary Report on Water Legislation Investigations for the Arkansas River Basin
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />2. Water quality. <br />3. Limited extent of aquifer and storage therein. <br />4. Colorado-Kansas compact. <br />5. Relative velocities of surface and ground water. <br />6. Variance in headgate water requirements because of: <br />a. Canal, lateral and farm losses. <br />b. Cropping patterns. <br />c. Soil types. <br />d. Winter irrigation. <br />7. Frying Pan Arkansas Project water importation. <br /> <br />Associated with the above mentioned items is the lack <br />of records for a sufficient number of years covering specific <br />conditions to establ ish accurate trends. For example, the benefits <br />to senior appropriators from the John Martin Reservoir Project have <br />been altered by the continued increase in use of well water. This <br />has changed the regimen of return flow to the stream. <br /> <br />The complex interrelationship of the numerous factors which <br />influence stream flow in the Arkansas River and its use cannot be <br />properly evaluated by conventional methods, and it seems probable that <br />any meaningful solutions must eventually be derived from the use of <br />analog and digital computors. Fortunately, the U. S. Geological Survey, <br />in cooperation with the Colorado Water Conservation Board and the South- <br />eastern Colorado Water Conservancy District, have constructed an analog <br />model for the Arkansas River Basin from Pueblo to the State Line. <br />Data collected by the Geological Survey include the extent, depth, <br />permeabil ity and transmissibi1 ity of the aquifer, well locations, and <br />estimated annual pumpage. <br /> <br />-7- <br /> <br /> <br />Several preliminary multiple regression analyses were run <br />on a digital computor on a seasonal basis for the 1928-l965 period. <br />Data used in the analyses were those obtained from the Bureau of Re- <br />clamation along with hydrologic data derived by us and by others. The <br />purpose of the study was to determine the principal natural and man-made <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.