Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Executive Summary <br /> <br />The purpose of this study is to examine the feasibility of alternatives to <br />accomplish two main objectives of the Seven Lakes Reservoir Company (SLRC) <br />associated with replacement of a railroad crossing over SLRC's critical flow path <br />through Dry Creek. The various alternatives were evaluated based on technical, <br />financial, environmental and institutional feasibility grounds. The first objective is <br />~ <br /> <br />to replace a 1 OO-year old deteriorated railroad culvert structure in Dry Creek that <br />is at the end of its useful service life. The ~~ond objective associated with the <br /> <br />,-- <br /> <br />replacement of the railroad culvert structure is to improve the flow transfer <br />capacity of the Greeley & Loveland Irrigation Company's (GLlC) Lake Loveland <br />Reservoir to the Seven Lakes Reservoir Company's Horseshoe Reservoir. <br />Presently the railroad culvert structure restricts the flow capacity of water from <br />the Lake Loveland North Outlet to Horseshoe Reservoir. This effort is intended to <br />assist the Seven Lakes Reservoir Company to provide irrigation water, in <br />cooperation with The Greeley & Loveland Irrigation Company (GLlC), to <br />approximately 15,000 acres of land in a safe and efficient manner. This study <br />examines the feasibility of the Company's objectives described in more detail as <br />follows: <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br /> <br />The Dry Creek Enhancement Project would include removal and replacement of <br />five existing railroad-crossing tunnels in Dry Creek North of Lake Loveland. The <br />structure is nearly 100 years old and the railroad crossing agreement, dated <br />1905, between the Colorado and Southern Railway Company (now Burlington <br />Northern Santa Fe Railroad) and the Seven Lakes Reservoir Company required <br />that SLRC bear all expense incurred in the construction, maintenance, repairs or <br />renewals of the canal and tunnels. This study evaluates the various methods for <br />replacement of the tunnels under the BNSR as well as needed capacity <br />improvements, within existing decrees, that would result through this section of <br />canal. This section of canal transfers water from Lake Loveland to Horseshoe <br />Lake and then to Boyd Lake. A complication associated with this project is the <br />