My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ZebMusStateRespPlan
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
ZebMusStateRespPlan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:34:38 PM
Creation date
4/2/2008 12:14:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8050.400.A
Description
Zebra Mussels
State
CO
Basin
Statewide
Date
3/20/2008
Title
Colorado Statewide Zebra Mussel Rapid Reponse Plan
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Operating Principles/Plan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
3. The CDOW should increase sampling in flowing waters (e.g., the Arkansas River <br />downstream from Pueblo Reservoir). <br />4. Develop a program for volunteers (see Washington State Department of Fish and <br />Wildlife). <br />5. Develop a predetermined response management protocol tha.t expedites decision- <br />making, information sharing, avoids duplication, and minimizes authority <br />conflicts, while preserving flexibility for adaptive management (see California <br />Zebra Mussel Rapid Response Plan). <br />Prevention <br />1. Offer courtesy watercraft inspections at the most important Very High and High <br />risk waters (based on the risk assessment) and selected Port-of-Entry locations. <br />2. Institute inspection and/or cleaning procedures for high risk boats (in addition to <br />public awareness programs) at Very High and High risk water bodies in Colorado <br />where boating access is under state or federal control. At Very High and High <br />risk water bodies not under state or federal control, the state should encourage, <br />assist and work with local authorities and marinalboat launch operators to ensure <br />that high risk boats are inspected and cleaned before entry. This should be based <br />on a prioritized bart risk assessment (e.g., type of boat and length of time the boat <br />spends on any one water). <br />3. The containment strategy for known infested waters (e.~., Pueblo Reservoir) <br />should include as a component the prioritization of risk by water craft type. At a <br />minimum, certain boats, such as houseboats, cabin cruisers, etc. that are moored <br />at the reservoir for extended periods of time should be required to be inspected <br />and decontaminated (if necessary) prior to leaving the reservoir. <br />4. Evaluate the utility of conducting courtesy boat inspections as Colorado Port of <br />Entry (and decontamination as well). <br />5. Develop boat inspection stickers with a date/time stamp for inspected boats and <br />vessels requiring decontamination (also consider paper or electronic "passports"). <br />6. Evaluate the feasibility of using mobile check stations (similar to game check <br />stations) in conjunction with the mobile port of entry stations. If decontamination <br />is necessary, they are directed to the nearest decontamination station location; or <br />they use a portable cleaning system if available. <br />7. Boat inspectors should generate a data log of watercraft traffic and conduct <br />standardized question/answer summaries so that entry patterns can be analyzed <br />and inspection efforts refined in the future. <br />9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.