My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP12927
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
WSP12927
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:34:14 PM
Creation date
3/25/2008 10:53:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8510.100.60
Description
Rio Grand Compact Commission
Basin
Rio Grande
Date
1/1/2004
Author
Rio Grande Compact Commission
Title
2004 Annual Report of the Rio Grand Compact Commission
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Annual Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />21 <br /> <br />Reclamation (Reclamation), the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps), the International Boundary and <br />Water Commission (IBWC), the U.S. Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service <br />(Service) to discuss in detail their specific water-related activities in the basin. Bill Ruth, the Federal <br />Chairman of the Commission attended the federal agency presentation portion of the meeting. <br />The New Mexico Engineer Adviser, as in 2003, declined to sign the 2004 Compact accounting <br />sheets because of a disagreement that arose during the fall of 2002 regarding the monthly reduction of <br />accrued credit water in storage in the Rio Grande Project. Although accrued credit water evaporation has <br />been calculated on a monthly basis since the early 1990's, prior to that time evaporation calculations and <br />credit and debit reductions for evaporation occurred annually. New Mexico reports it became concemed <br />in November 2002, upon leaming that Reclamation planned to change its 2003 Rio Grande Project <br />operations from those conducted in the 1940's, 1950's, 1960's, 1970's and 1980's due to the change in <br />reporting on the Compact accounting sheets that began in 1990. The Engineer Advisers agreed that a <br />resolution of this issue may be reached after additional discussion and will explore this issue further in <br />2005. <br /> <br />New Mexico - Texas Relinauishment Aareement <br />In 2003 New Mexico offered and Texas accepted a relinquishment of a portion of New Mexico's <br />accrued credits then held in Project Storage in Elephant Butte Reservoir. On April 23, 2003 the two states <br />reached agreement for New Mexico to relinquish to Texas a total of 217,500 acre-feet of accrued credits, <br />with 122,500 acre-feet of that amount accepted at that time, and the balance (up to 95,000 acre-feet if <br />available) to be accepted on March 1, 2004. <br />Due to under-delivery and evaporation, the total relinquishment over the two years actually totaled <br />175,500 acre-feet. The relinquishment allowed the storage of a like amount of water in post-1929 <br />reservoirs in New Mexico upstream of Elephant Butte Reservoir over as many years as necessary to <br />capture it when the storage prohibition of Article VII is in effect. <br />A total of 146,143 acre-feet of relinquished water was stored in 2003 and 2004 (88,270 acre-feet <br />in 2003; 57,873 acre-feet in 2004), leaving a balance of 29,357 acre-feet to be captured in future years. <br />At the end of 2004,20,218 acre-feet of relinquished water remained in storage in EI Vado Reservoir and <br />253 acre-feet in Nichols Reservoir. <br /> <br />Colorado - Texas Relinauishment Aareement <br />Colorado began 2004 with 1,200 acre-feet of accrued credit. Native water was stored in Platoro <br />Reservoir, a post-Compact reservoir, when storage was prohibited under Article VII of the Compact. This <br />storage occurred during the period November 5, 2003 through March 24, 2004 while the release from the <br />reservoir was reduced for normal winter operations. The maximum release possible through the bypass <br />valves under the reservoir head conditions at that time is approximately eight cubic feet per second. The <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.