My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00290 (2)
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00290 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:33:54 PM
Creation date
3/20/2008 1:24:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Project Name
The Medicine Bow Ecology Project
Title
The Potential Sensitivity of Various Ecosystem Components to Winter Precipitation Management in the Medicine Bow Mountains, Wyoming
Prepared For
Bureau of Reclaimation
Date
2/28/1975
State
WY
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
402
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />4 <br /> <br />silver iodide treatment, of course, must be applied in some manner <br />,ather than seeding, but meaningful data can be obtained for some <br />org~ln'isms, in particular small plants and micro-organisms. Analysis <br />of variance can be used to evaluate treatment effect with a certain <br />degree of confidence. This approach was used in the Medicine Bow <br />Project for one vegetation study and two studies on silver iodide <br />toxicity. <br />Before-and-af ter mon i tor i ng approach <br />This approach is desirable because no'control is necessary and <br />actual cloud seeding provides .the snow treatment. It is a desirable <br />phase of any impact study and has been an important approach for the <br />Medicine Bow Projec~. Considerable baseline information 'is included <br />in this report. <br />The disadvantages-with the before-and-after approach are that the <br />impact is not known until it's happened over a large area,' which seems <br />I ike a poor management approach, and there. is often the question about <br />whether the changes that occurred after the cloud seeding were in <br /> <br />. . <br />. fact caused by the seed i ng or some other natura I phenomenon. We can <br />expect this problem in the case of winter precipitation management <br />because the secondar~ ~col09ical effects are not likely t~ be observed <br />for several years, if .not decades. The ecosystems are already adapted <br />to considerable year to year fluctuations in snowfall, so changes will <br />probably result from a modified mean annual snowfall or a modified <br />sequence of heavy and light snowfall years. The accumulation of Ag <br />compounds to toxic levels is also likely to be slow. <br />The system ana.lysis approach <br />Invariably an evaluation of impact calls for an analysis of the <br />ecosystems in which a new management program is planned. These eco- <br />systems are sufficiently complex that rarely is a total system analysis <br />possible. Experience gained from the International Biol.ogical Program <br />suggests that such an effort is also expensive. However, to one degree <br />or another, using various tools and with variable success, ecologists <br />for y'ears have worked toward gaining a better understanding' of ecosystem <br />structure and function. Usually the focus has 'been on sub-systems for <br /> <br />-, <br /> <br />') <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />! <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />-, <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />... <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />~ . <br /> <br />oIIi; ~ <br /> <br />.... <br /> <br />"'" <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.