My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00290 (2)
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00290 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:33:54 PM
Creation date
3/20/2008 1:24:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Project Name
The Medicine Bow Ecology Project
Title
The Potential Sensitivity of Various Ecosystem Components to Winter Precipitation Management in the Medicine Bow Mountains, Wyoming
Prepared For
Bureau of Reclaimation
Date
2/28/1975
State
WY
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
402
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />General Research Design <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />... <br /> <br />At least four approaches can be utilized for evaluating the <br />ecological impact of weather modification: <br />I. controlled large-scale experiment approach. <br />2. controlled small-scale experiment approach. <br />3. before-and-after monitoring approach. <br />4. systems analysis approach. <br />The discussion that follows describes briefly a rationale that has <br />been useful for determining the beSt approach f~r each of the seven <br />studies that are part of the Medicine Bow Ecology Project. <br />,Controlled large-scale experiment ~)ach <br />An ideal option would seem to be the location of two very compar- <br />able watersheds, one of which would be seeded to increase snowfall <br />and the other not seeded. After considerable di'scussion, this approach <br />was essentially abandoned for the following reasons. First, ilt seemed <br />doubtful that a legitimate control of \</atershed size, could be found. <br />Two areas of several square kilometers would most likely be toe) <br />different in microclimate and vegetative cover, so that differences <br />that occurred after the treatment probably could nqt be attributed <br />confidently to the snow-treatment effect. Secondl)', because the <br />treatment effect could possibly be difficult t6 detect in a short time, <br />several field seasons would probably be required Just to select the <br />two "comparable" watersheds. Careful measurements would be required <br />from a large number of watersheds before the best combination could <br />be seleded. Thirdly, the best two watersheds for such an experi- <br />ment would probably be adjacent, and there Is the question of whether <br />a cloud~eeding operation could prevent artificial precipitation on <br />the control. Because of these problems, the Medicine Bow Project has <br />focused more on small-scale experiments, where controls can be more <br />easily established. <br />Controll~d sm~IJ-scale experiment approach <br />The ~d~antage of this approach is that <br />established and replications are possible. <br /> <br />controls are more easily <br />The snow treatment or <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />." <br /> <br />,.,,... <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />,,. <br /> <br />... <br /> <br />... <br /> <br />..."' <br /> <br />'Jr... . !~ <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />'u <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.