My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00290
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00290
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:33:47 PM
Creation date
3/5/2008 10:45:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Title
1994 Field Operation Plan
Date
1/1/1994
State
UT
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />than 4 h on-station time per mission. In contrast, AgI and SF 6 gas can be continuously observed day and <br />night at the mountain observatories, and with the van for many hours during each storm, subject to crew <br />fatigue and road conditions. <br /> <br />The T&D 'of valley-released AgI will continue to be investigated, since most operational seeding generators <br />are in valleys (a few are in canyon mouths). Canyon-mouth releases of tracer gas, and high-altitude releases <br />of both AgI and tracer gas also will be studied. A good sample of valley seeding under weakly convective <br />conditions was obtained in early 1991, but more stable storms should be sampled. Accordingly, investigation <br />of the T&D of valley-released AgI will be concentrated in the fIrst month of the 1994 fIeld project when <br />more stable storms are expected. These observations will enable further evaluation of the effectiveness of <br />the Utah operational seeding program in delivery of appropriate AgI concentrations to desired SLW cloud <br />regions. <br /> <br />Canyon releases of SF6 will be made in the mouth of Birch Creek, a typical major canyon located between <br />the HAS and AHS seeding sites. Birch Creek Canyon has two major branches which head near the RRS so <br />surface detection is practical on the Plateau top. Two high-altitude seeding sites will be tested as this <br />seeding method may offer a future alternative or supplement to present valley and canyon-mouth seeding. <br />High-altitude seeding is the preferred approach for the direct detection experiments because targeting of the <br />Plateau-top instrument sites is more likely. <br /> <br />Valley releases of AgI will be made using 3 sites chosen by NA WC as likely to target the RRS and upwind <br />highway. <br /> <br />Both AgI and propane seeding will be tested from the high-altitude sites. Propane may offer a means of <br />seeding the frequent slightly supercooled periods (0 to -6 oc) when AgI is likely ineffective. <br /> <br />As in the 1991 program, both AgI and SF 6 tracer gas will be used in T &D investigations, the latter to <br />simulate AgI plumes. The characteristics of available detectors are such that SF6 plumes can be observed <br />more precisely in space and more quantitatively in concentration than AgI plumes. The main advantage of <br />tracking AgI is that it is far more economical to release detectable amounts of AgI than SF 6. Consequently, <br />it is affordable to release AgI from multiple sites over many hours. <br /> <br />Ongoing analysis of the 1991 IN observations suggests that any sampling site along the upwind highway <br />generally indicated whether or not the valley-released AgI was reaching the Plateau top in concentrations <br />well above background. That is, AgI concentrations usually were similar all along the ilpwind highway when <br />averaged for a number of vehicle passes (a few exceptions had AgI concentrated near the head of Fairview <br />Canyon). In contrast, aircraft observations of valley-released AgI tended to be concentrated above the <br />mouth of Fairview Canyon (Fig. 1) when sampled along the upwind flight path. This was very likely because <br />of favorable transport up this atypically deep canyon, and the lower aircraft sampling altitudes possible over <br />this portion of the Plateau (3200 m compared to 3800 about 10 km further south). <br /> <br />Analyses of 1991 data are suggesting that it is often impractical to sample valley-released AgI (or SF6) with <br />an aircraft in-cloud over the west edge of the Plateau except over the lower elevation portion of the flight <br />track. The aircraft simply cannot sample at a sufficiently low altitude while maintaining a safe vertical <br />separation above the terrain. This tentative fInding makes it challenging to investigate the T &D of valley- <br />released AgI with an aircraft. <br /> <br />It is planned to again simultaneously release AgI from multiple valley sites in order to increase the chances <br />of targeting the upwind highway. Finding AgI along the upwind highway while not detecting it overhead by <br />aircraft documents the plume top to within about 600 m. This is equivalent to a 4 oC temperature difference <br />under average lapse rate conditions. However, 1991 sampling over the Plateau and earlier similar sampling <br />over the Grand Mesa of Colorado suggests the plume top would usually be nearer the aircraft than the <br /> <br />9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.