Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Alternative 2 - No-Action <br /> <br />If the improvements to the dam are not completed, the SEO could restrict the storage; and <br />could effectively require the complete breach ofthe dam and loss of the storage reservoir. The costs <br />associated with this alternative would be for the lost of the water rights. The lost of the water rights <br />would cost approximately $1,900,000, based on the annual reservoir yield for 474 AF at a rate of <br />$4,000/AF. Boyle believes this is not a viable alternative and it is precluded from further <br />consideration. <br /> <br />Lake Arrowhead Dam Rehabilitation Feasibility Study <br /> <br />13 <br /> <br />B~DVLE <br />