Laserfiche WebLink
--Jerke: Have you done bonding for the water district? <br />--Mark: Yes, we currently have two loans. We are asking for grant <br />money because we have already taxed the community. <br />--Jerke: Projects that have done well here have had multiple partners <br />and multiple beneficiaries. We have approved about $250,000 for <br />four different projects that include many different players. This <br />project is a unique request with the fact that it is singular as per its <br />beneficiary. Further discussion. <br />--Ken Huson: Boulder County Municipalities. I am familiar with <br />Pinewood Springs water dilemma. We are trying to work with <br />Pinewood Springs Water District; I would say that there are other <br />beneficiaries. There is a broader benefit because of Pinewood pulling <br />water from BT. At the worst part of the drought, the National Guard <br />had to haul water. I would add that this is a wet water project; and <br />this is not a study, this is an actual reservoir. One of our charges is to <br />fill the gap. If we can put our money to actual projects, tlus is <br />important. <br />--Sasha Charney: Note the match in the application; this is over a <br />$lmillion project with more coming that will be phased in over the <br />next few years; thus, the fielding would be matched with other fiends. <br />--Mark: The conul7unity, from its tax base, has invested over <br />$150,000 to get studies completed and to get project going. With <br />dam completion, the project will turn into a 3.6million project. We <br />have accumulated $485,000 in mill levy in anticipation of funding <br />this reservoir. <br />--McVicker: If we were to approve, this would exhaust our basin <br />fund. <br />--Mark: We are now asking for $210,000. <br />--Greg Kernohan: General thinking is that this would not compete at <br />the statewide level? <br />--Correct. Would not meet the threshold requirements. <br />--Shimmin: Would like to table this. Establish acct-off date for all <br />new fiinding requests for the current fiscal year. Tlus one, <br />Georgetown application, get all applications to us by March. Then <br />also look at the Republican River Basin and then consider all at <br />once. Do not lalow how handle these one at a time. <br />Move first that we table this application. <br />--Jim Yahn: Seconds. <br />Discussion: <br />--Sasha Charney: Please clarify timing of funding. <br />--Nicole Rowan (CDM): Statewide fielding: March meeting; Board <br />entertains basin account at every board meeting. So for Basin <br />account, act on them in March and forward to Board for <br />consideration. <br />Motion carries to continue until March. <br />10 <br />