Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />AL TERNA nVE FORMULA nON BRIEFING <br />DRAFT FEASIBILITY REPORTIDEIS <br />COMPLETEDIRELEASED TO PUBLIC <br />Public Meetings <br />45-day public & Agency Review and Comment <br />Period <br />Address Public and Agency Comments/Prelim Final <br />FRlEIS Complete <br />ITR Team Review of Prelim Final FRlEIS (incl. <br />incorporated public comment) <br />Preliminary Final FRlEIS Completed <br />Draft ROD Completed <br />NWD Review Completed; Command Notice <br />FINAL FRlEIS <br />HQ Final Policy Review Certification <br />Civil Works Review Board <br />EP A Filing <br />Notice of Availability ofFRlFEIS; Public & Agency <br />Review Period <br />Chief of Engineers Recommendations; Draft ROD <br />Finalized <br />ASA(CW) signs ROD <br /> <br />9. PROJECT RISK <br /> <br />8-Feb-07 <br /> <br />ll-Apr-08 <br /> <br />2-May-08 <br /> <br />18-Jul-08 <br />8-Aug-08 <br />18-Aug-08 <br /> <br />19-5ep-08 <br />3-0ct-08 <br />10-0ct-08 <br /> <br />24-0ct-08 <br /> <br />2-Jan-09 <br /> <br />23-Jan-08 <br />8-FE:b-08 <br />10-14 Mar-08 <br />ll-Apr-08 <br /> <br />25-Apr-08 <br /> <br />18-Jul-08 <br /> <br />8-Aug-08 <br />15-Aug-08 <br />5-Sep-08 <br />19-5ep-08 <br />3-0ct-08 <br />1O-0ct-08 <br />17 -Oct-08 <br /> <br />2-Jan-09 <br /> <br />23-Jan-09 <br />27-Feb-09 <br /> <br />The study will identify any potential reallocation alternatives that could pose dam safety <br />risks. The study will either identify solutions to mitigate the risk or the alternative will be <br />eliminated from further consideration. The reallocation has the potential to create <br />significant environmental and recreational impacts. Mitigation requirements will be <br />identified where necessary. <br /> <br />The total cost of the reallocated storage, will be borne by the interested water <br />providers unless avenues for cost share are found (potentially Ecosystem Restoration <br />alternatives or allocation of some water to agricultural purposes). It is likely that no <br />Federal costs will be incurred beyond the cost of the feasibility study. There is a risk <br />that the impact analysis will identify costs that are too high to be economical to the <br />Denver area water providers. All interested parties have been and continue to be <br />involved in the study, through meetings, development of related studies and other <br />communications. If, at some point, the interest in reallocation diminishes because of <br />costs, the feasibility study would be terminated. This would involve meetings with <br />the non-Federal sponsor and the interested water providers. The feasibility study will <br />continually examine potential physical risks to the Chatfield structure. If <br /> <br /> <br />5 <br />