My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PUB00152
CWCB
>
Publications
>
DayForward
>
PUB00152
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2011 11:19:47 AM
Creation date
1/18/2008 12:46:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
2007
Title
Chatfield, Cherry Creek, and Bear Creek Colorado Reallocation Feasibility Study
CWCB Section
Administration
Author
US Army Coprs of Engineers
Description
Chatfield, Cherry Creek, and Bear Creek Colorado Reallocation Feasibility Study
Publications - Doc Type
Tech Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />potential hazards relative to site conditions, including water safety concerns, driving <br />safety, climate related hazards, presence of dangerous wildlife, vectors, and plants, and <br />needed safety equipment. Appropriate safety briefings prior to any field activity, such as <br />site visits, will be conducted to apprise groups of any potential hazards. Initially the PM <br />and the Sponsor will generate a list of potential hazards and conduct a Preliminary <br />Hazard Analysis (PHA). More detailed safety plans may be developed for specific <br />contract work or future project phases. ThePMP will be amended as needed to <br />incorporate these plans. <br /> <br />11. CHANGE MANAGEMENT. <br />Change management is necessary because projects infrequently run precisely according to <br />the PMP. Change Management will allow for controlling and updating the FCA and PMP <br />(scope, cost, budget, schedule, quality requirements, etc.) based upon approved procedures. <br />Changes must have the approval of the study Sponsor and the Corps. Changes or <br />anticipated changes will be reported monthly to the Sponsor. If there are no significant <br />changes in scope, costs, and schedule, the project managers can approve the change and <br />record it in a modification to the PMP. Periodic team meetings with the PDT and the <br />affected water supply interests have been conducted throughout the course of the study in <br />order to coordinate change and provide periodic updates. <br /> <br />If there are changes that would result in an increase in total study cost or a delay in <br />completion of the overall study, the Corps will follow a procedure known as the Project <br />Schedule and Cost Change Report (SACCR). After concurrence from the Study <br />Management Team, the Corps PM will prepare the SACCR in concert with a program <br />analyst with the Planning, Programs and Project Management Division. This provides a <br />justification for the changes. Action is taken on SACCR's at the Omaha District and <br />Northwestern Division project review boards. To be approved by the Corps at the <br />District and the Division level, a SACCR must first be approved and signed by the study <br />Sponsor if the study is in a cost-shared phase. At the local level, the request for change <br />and costs would be reviewed by the Sponsors PM and Sponsor senior leadership. <br /> <br />Schedule changes are anticipated due the iterative nature of the planning process, and the <br />nature of Federal budget cycles. The schedule changes are being communicated semi- <br />formally with the Sponsor, Omaha District Senior Leadership and Northwestern Division <br />bye-mail, Project Review Committee (PRe) and the PQR. <br /> <br /> <br />Both the Corps and the Sponsor have veto power over any proposed scope and cost <br />changes. This provides both parties protection against commitments that would be <br />unacceptable to either party; the intent is that issues would be resolved at the Study Team <br />Level as much as possible. There will be monthly opportunities for thorough <br />communication about potential issues at the Corps at Project Review Board (PRB) <br />meetings and at the Sponsor level at regular agency meetings. Issues that cannot be <br />resolved at the level of the PDT would be raised to the Executive Committee. The <br />Omaha District would assign the Deputy to the Omaha District Commander, currently <br /> <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.