My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11a
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
11a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:34:19 PM
Creation date
1/17/2008 4:25:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
1/22/2008
Description
CF Section – Construction Fund and Severance Tax Trust Fund Perpetual Base Account – New Loans - Pagosa Area Water & Sanitation District - Dry Gulch Reservoir Project Land Purchase
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Pagosa Area Water & Sanitation Dishict <br />7anuaiy 14, 2007 <br />Page 4 of 6 <br />.Agenda Item l la <br />2040 demands would have to begin upon completion of the initial reservoir. The plan is to construct as large <br />a reservoir as justified by future demand estimates and financing capability. A 2005 Repoli indicates that <br />35,000 AF of storage will be needed to meet the demands and provide one year drought safety margin <br />through 2100. <br />The first phase of environmental (endangered plants and species) and archeological studies was completed in <br />the summer of 2007 with no fatal flaws found which would prohibit the construction of the Reser~~oir. The <br />next phase of studies will begin in early 2008 and will include evaluation of specific capacity needs, pumping <br />plant design on the San Juan River to fill the Reservoir, 404 Permitting, environmental work in the river <br />channel, and evaluation of bypass flows needed. The larger the bypass and/or demand, the larger the pump <br />size because a large bypass limits the periods of time that pumping can occur. In addition, the larger the <br />reservoir, the smaller the pumping plant because carryover storage is greater and complete refills are less <br />frequent. <br />Selected Altern atii~e <br />Dry Gulch is the best site available to the District to construct a reservoir to meet future water needs. <br />Land Purchase Projected Costs <br />Weber Property $10,320,000 <br />Laverty Property 2,020,000 <br />Total $12,340,000 <br />Closing on Weber property was January 3, 2008. The closing was completed in part with a bridge loan at <br />4.5% from Wells Fargo and the use of the $1 million grant to the SJWCD. The Laverty property closing is <br />expected to occur in late 2008. Technical studies and permitting are estimated to occur from 2008 until 2017. <br />The period from 2018 to 2019 will be used for construction financing, elections if necessary, bidding, <br />contractor selection, and beginning construction. An appraisal for the Weber parcel has been completed by <br />Walters & Mullins Inc., of Alamosa, dated August 22, 2007, valued the property at $10,525,000. <br />Financial Analysis <br />Table 1 shows a summary of the financial aspects of the loan request. The District qualifies for a Municipal <br />Middle Income Interest Rate of 3.50%for 30-years. <br />Table 1. Financial Summary <br />PROJECT/LOAN <br />Land Ac uisition Cost $12,340,000 <br />CWCB Loan (90% of Ac uisition Costs) $11,106,000 <br />CWCB Loan (Inc. 1% Service Fee) $11,217,060 <br />CWCB Annual Loan Pa ment $609,350 <br />CWCB Loan Obli ation (includin 10% debt reserve fundin) $670,290 <br />Monthly Per Tap Cost of CWCB Loan (6,950 taps) $8.00/mo. <br />Land Purchase price per acre (670 acres) $14,300/acre <br />Creditworthiness: The District operates its Enterprise (water and wastewater) fund as self supporting. <br />Revenues received from user fees and other general fund sources are sufficient to cover the day-to-day <br />operating expenses of these funds, as well as assist in the funding of capital improvements. The District is <br />required to supply revenues in amounts that would exceed expenses by at least 125% of the average annual <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.