My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11a
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
11a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:34:19 PM
Creation date
1/17/2008 4:25:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
1/22/2008
Description
CF Section – Construction Fund and Severance Tax Trust Fund Perpetual Base Account – New Loans - Pagosa Area Water & Sanitation District - Dry Gulch Reservoir Project Land Purchase
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Pagosa Area Water & Sanitation Dishict <br />7anuaiy 14, 2007 <br />Page 3 of 6 <br />.Agenda Item l la <br />The District and SJWCD have been working together to plan and construct the facilities necessary to meet <br />growing demands within their boundaries. In recent years, they have combined resources to perform <br />engineering studies and evaluations necessary for long-range water resources planning. The SJWCD will <br />likely provide funding assistance for Reservoir construction by utilizing its taxing authority. <br />Water Rights <br />The District has a portfolio of absolute and conditional water rights including limited senior water rights such <br />as 6.5 cfs (100 AF/yr limit) and 3 cfs in the Town Pipeline from the San Juan River. The Dry Gulch Project <br />could utilize some of the District's senior and conditional rights for the 180 cfs diversion and 29,000 AF of <br />storage that were obtained in Division 7 Water Court Case No. 04CW85; however, this ruling was remanded <br />back to Water Court by the Supreme Court in October 2007. The Dry Gulch Reservoir has a 6,300 AF <br />conditional storage right with a 1967 priority via the Park Ditch. With additional direct flow storage right it <br />would increase the reservoir size to 35,000 AF. The 35,000 AF conditional storage right is included in the <br />Water Court Case No. 04CW85. <br />At a Status Conference held by Division 7 Water Court on December 14, 2007, the District and Trout <br />Unlimited (opposing) have been asked to provide legal briefs in response to the Supreme Court's ruling by <br />February 11, 2008. <br />The new diversion rights from the San Juan River will be junior to the CWCB's instream flow water right on <br />the San Juan River. Consequently, diversions to the reservoir may not reduce flows in the San Juan River <br />below 50 cfs. (March 1 August 31) and 30 cfs (September 1 February 28). <br />Project Description <br />Until 2002, the water source for two thirds of the District service area was diversions from Fourmile Creek <br />through the Dutton Ditch into the Stollsteimer Creek drainage to serge the Pagosa Lakes area. These <br />diversions were used to fill several resefvoirs, primarily Hatcher and Stevens; however, the water rights were <br />junior to irrigation rights in the Dutton Ditch and were normally out of priority by the end of May. <br />In 2002, the District constructed a 4.6 cfs pump and pipeline from the San Juan River to a new treatment <br />plant. These facilities now provide the majority of the water supply for the Pagosa Lakes area. In order to <br />maximize the water supply from Fourmile Creek, the District has constructed the Dutton Ditch pipeline which <br />replaces the old open ditch with a pressure pipe in order to minimize conveyance losses and improve the <br />ability to divert during winter months. The District is also enlarging the Stevens Reservoir from about 600 to <br />1,700 AF which is underway. <br />Beginning in the late 1980's, the District and SJWCD understood that additional storage capacity would be <br />required to meet their long term demands. A 1989 Report evaluated several potential reservoir sites. The <br />evaluation of these sites showed that the Hidden Valley Reservoir was the best site to store Fourmile Creek <br />diversions and Dry Gulch Reservoir was the best site for San Juan River diversions. The Hidden `'alley <br />Reservoir site was purchased and developed by a private entity and is no longer available to the District. The <br />Dry Gulch Reservoir site is the best remaining site; a 4,000 AF reservoir was evaluated in the 1989 Report. <br />A 2003 Report re-evaluated the reservoir options and again concluded that the Dry Gulch Reservoir was the <br />best site. This report evaluated a 4,000 AF reservoir and a 12,500 AF reservoir, both of which had essentially <br />the same cost per AF of yield ($4,100/AF). The total projected price of a 35,000 AF Reservoir is expected to <br />be about $2,300/AF. <br />Due to the 20 year lead time to construct a reservoir project, the reservoir would not be operational unti12030. <br />If the reservoir was only constructed to meet the 2040 demand, plans for the enlargement to meet the post- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.