Laserfiche WebLink
Section 9 <br />Evaluation Framework <br />North Platte and Ria Grande Basins <br />The results for the North Platte and Rio Grande Basins <br />are shown in Figures 9-9 and 9-10, respectively. <br />25°r <br />20°r <br />15°r <br />10°r <br />5% <br />or <br /> 21% <br /> 17% <br /> <br />11% 14% <br /> 8% 8% <br />sr <br /> <br />N'S -~p <br />E¢ ~ N- <br />E~° <br />~ <br />° N~ <br />t0 0 O tV0 ~ <br />~ ~ 0 y~nj <br />~ - 0 N T <br />>> <br />O a <br />T_ E <br />- ~ T U E <br />-' > <br />n <br />~yJ <br />~ ~ <br />L d r N <br />~> ~ U ~ <br />> <br />O ~ <br />(J ~ ~> N <br />N- <br />LL <br />~ <br />m~~ <br />m c ~ <br />mQ <br />m (n <br />d <br />~E`i W ~ O <br />a <br />~O O 0 ~ <br />a>L <br />` :_. <br />o~ <br />` O <br />~ aO <br />o <br />- :_ Ww w <br />a ` <br />~ ~ ,s <br />o a <br />~ Range of W eights for All Interests ~ All Ixxterests Average Weight <br />Figrure ~-,9 <br />North Platte River Basin Objective Weights <br />25° <br />zo~ <br />15° <br />10° <br />5% <br />0% <br />d°~~ <br />Eo.~ "- <br />~~° m'^ <br />~~Q ~o~ `om~ <br />~~~ o~ <br />~~ - `o m= <br />>? ~o~ <br />T~ci E <br />-'~ ~ T c~i ~ <br />-'c ~ lyJ L N r <br />~(n W ~ Q ~> ~ ci <br />O 0 ~ <br />` > <br />0:=. (J ~ ~> N <br />O N- <br />LL <br />~~~ <br />m <br />- ~Q <br />m N <br />~E~i ~p° <br />:_ a <br />.>L <br />W W o~ <br />aw ~ aO <br />o <br />` <br />~ - ~ ,s <br />0 a <br />~ Range of W eights for All Interests ~ All Ixxt erests Average Weight <br />Figure 9-10 <br />Rio Grande Basin Objective Weights <br />J~~a <br />$~ole'ri~ice Wo~e' $upplY Initia~ive <br /> <br /> 18% <br /> <br /> <br />11 % 14% 14% <br /> <br />11 % <br />12° <br /> 9% 9% <br /> <br />For these two basins, there were not enough participants <br />to group them in the different interests. Therefore, the <br />results are presented for the overall group. <br />The following observations can be made for the North <br />Platte and Rio Grande Basins: <br />For the group as a whole for the North Platte basin, <br />the highest weighted objectives are Meet Agricultural <br />Demands, Meet Municipal & Industrial Demands, and <br />Optimize Existing Water Supplies, which vary <br />between 15 and 21 percent. The lowest weighted <br />objective is Provide for Operational Flexibility at <br />6 percent. <br />2. For the group as a whole for the Rio Grande basin, <br />the highest weighted objectives are Meet Agricultural <br />Demands, Optimize Existing Water Supplies, and <br />Provide for Operational Flexibility, which vary <br />between 12 and 18 percent. The lowest weighted <br />objectives are Enhance Recreational Opportunities <br />and Promote Cost Effectiveness both at 8 percent. <br />South Platte Basin <br />The results for the South Platte Basin are shown in <br />Figure 9-11. <br />25 % <br />20 % <br />15% <br />10% <br />5% <br />0% <br /> <br /> <br />18% 19% <br /> 15% <br />11% <br />12% 14% <br /> <br />6% 7% <br /> <br />N'S ~ <br />~ ~ C yJ - in <br />~ ~ ~ O~ ~ in <br />~ ~ d N N~ <br />N ~ C O N ~ <br />d C ~ O~ <br />C N~ <br />`-~-' ? `p N T <br />d ~ ~ <br />T ¢ E <br />-~~ T c~i ~ <br />-. <br />W u~ ~ L <br />W U 0 'S ~ ci ~ <br />> > <br />U '$ ~ <br />- <br />Q <br />m~ ` Q <br />mQ d a 0 O ~ <br />a5L ~~ ~ 0~ <br />aOLL <br />~ <br />m <br />- <br />m ~E`i <br />:_ ~O Ww` o <br />a"w o <br />` <br />in in ,s <br />O a <br />Q Agricultural/Ranching Interest ~ Environmental/Recreational Interest <br />Average Weight Average Weight <br />• Municipal Water Interest ~ All Interests Average Weight <br />Average Weight <br />~ Range of Weights for All Interests <br />~~~~~~ ~-a1 <br />South Platte Basin Objective Weights <br />~~ <br />S:\REPORT\WORD PROCESSING\REPORT\S9 11-10.04.DOC 9-11 <br />