Laserfiche WebLink
Section 9 <br />Evaluation Framework <br />The municipal interest group average weights (when <br />compared against the overall group averages) are <br />highest for objectives such as Meet Municipal & <br />Industrial Demands and Promote Cost Effectiveness; <br />while they are lowest for Meet Agricultural Demands, <br />Enhance Recreational Opportunities and Protect <br />Cultural Values; and they are about average for <br />Optimize Existing & Future Supplies, Provide for <br />Environmental Enhancement, and Provide for <br />Operational Flexibility. <br />Environmental and recreational interest average <br />weights (when compared against the overall group <br />averages) are highest for objectives such as Enhance <br />Recreational Opportunities, Provide for <br />Environmental Enhancement, and Promote Cost <br />Effectiveness; while they are lowestfor Optimize <br />Existing & Future Supplies and Protect Cultural <br />Values; and they are about average for Meet <br />Agricultural Demands and Provide for Operational <br />Flexibility. <br />Gunnison Basin <br />The results for the Gunnison Basin are shown in <br />Figure 9-8. <br />17% <br />15% <br />12% <br />10% <br />5% <br />noi <br />11% <br />N°5 ~ N- <br />~ m N~ O N ~ 0~ - 0 N T <br />> <br />~ ¢ C <br />T~= E ~ ? <br />T ~ E ~ > ¢ <br />~ ~ ~ C <br />~~ r ~ C N <br />'~ E ~ ~ 0 ~ <br />N C > <br />U> '~ m <br />= <br />- ~ ~ <br />m~ -~c ~ <br />m Q ~ iD <br />N w ~ o <br />a 0 0~ <br />a~ L o <br />o d- <br />o ~ ~ a O LL <br />~ <br />m <br />- <br />m ~E~i <br />:_ ~p° WW aw o <br />` <br />~ ~ ,s <br />O a <br />Q Agricultural/Ranching Interest ~ Environmental/Recreational Interest <br />Average Weight Average Weight <br />• Municipal Water Interest ~ All Interests Average Weight <br />Average Weight <br />~ Range of Weights for All Interests <br />Figure 9-8 <br />Gunnison Basin Objective Weights <br />~~ <br />The following observations can be made for the <br />Gunnison Basin: <br />For the group as a whole, the highest weighted <br />objectives are Meet Agricultural Demands, Optimize <br />Existing Water Supplies, and Provide Operational <br />Flexibility, which vary between 15 and 17 percent. <br />The lowest weighted objective is Protect Cultural <br />Values at 9 percent. <br />2. The agricultural interest average weights (when <br />compared against the overall group averages) are <br />highest for objectives such as Meet Agricultural <br />Demands, Provide for Environmental Enhancement, <br />and Protect Cultural Values; while they are lowest for <br />Meet Municipal & Industrial Demands and Promote <br />Cost Effectiveness; and about average for Optimize <br />Existing & Future Supplies, Enhance Recreational <br />Opportunities, and Provide for Operational Flexibility. <br />3. The municipal interest group average weights (when <br />compared against the overall group averages) are <br />highest for objectives such as Meet Municipal & <br />Industrial Demands, Protect Cultural Values, and <br />Provide for Operational Flexibility; while they are <br />lowest for Optimize Existing & Future Water Supplies, <br />Provide for Environmental Enhancement, and <br />Promote Cost Effectiveness; and they are about <br />average for Meet Agricultural Demands and Enhance <br />Recreational Opportunities. <br />4. Environmental and recreational interest average <br />weights (when compared against the overall group <br />averages) are highest for objectives such as Enhance <br />Recreational Opportunities and Provide for <br />Environmental Enhancement; while they are lowest <br />for Meet Municipal & Industrial Demands, Meet <br />Agricultural Demands and Promote Cost <br />Effectiveness; and about average for Optimize <br />Existing & Future Supplies, Protect Cultural Values, <br />and Provide for Operational Flexibility. <br />~J~~a <br />Statew~itle Water Supply Inii'iative <br />9-10 S:\REPORT\WORD PROCESSING\REPORT\S9 11-10.04.DOC <br />