My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
S5_11-15-04
CWCB
>
SWSI
>
DayForward
>
S5_11-15-04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/26/2010 9:24:17 AM
Creation date
1/10/2008 10:54:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
SWSI
Basin
Statewide
Title
SWSI Phase 1 Report - Section 5 Projected Water Use
Date
11/15/2004
Author
CWCB
SWSI - Doc Type
Final Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Section 5 <br />Projected Water Use <br />~ <br />5.3 Projected 2030 Agricultural <br />Demand <br />Projections of 2030 agricultural demands and supporting <br />data are presented in Table 5-8. As a result of the <br />estimated potential changes in irrigated acres, <br />agricultural demands and their associated gross <br />diversions are shown as decreasing in the Arkansas, <br />Colorado, Gunnison Rio Grande, and South Platte <br />Basins. Demands in the Dolores/San Juan/San Miguel <br />and Yampa/ White Green <br />Basins may have a net <br />increase if additional <br />agricultural supplies are <br />developed to provide for the <br />increase in irrigated acres. <br />Gunnison Basin agricultural <br />demands could increase if <br />additional supplies are <br />developed to reduce shortages <br />on existing irrigated lands. The <br />North Platte Basin is not <br />expected to have a significant <br />To better anticipate future conditions, it is helpful to <br />examine existing supply and demand. Current <br />agricultural water shortages (crop requirement - supply <br />greater than zero) for the basins with DSS tools have <br />been evaluated. There are a number of factors that <br />impact the calculation of water shortages such as the <br />relative priority of water rights, the physical supply of <br />water available for diversion at any given point, and <br />irrigation practices. These factors are discussed in <br />greater detail below. First, under the Colorado prior <br />2% <br />12% ' <br />^ ,~qricultural <br />^ M&I <br />^ ssi <br />appropriation system, water is <br />allocated based on the priority of the <br />water right, so that during times of <br />average to less than average <br />streamflows, some water rights will <br />not be in priority, resulting in a <br />shortage of water to meet irrigation <br />water requirements. The South <br />Platte and Arkansas Basins have <br />many irrigation ditches that are <br />water-short as a result of the <br />extensive appropriation and <br />Figure 5-9 competition for water in these <br />change in demands. Relative Pr~~or~ions ofAgricultural, M~l, basins. The development of the <br />and ssl water use in 203o Colorado-Big Thompson (CBT) <br />A summary of total projected Project in the South Platte and the <br />Colorado agricultural use relative to M&I and SSI Frying Pan-Arkansas (Fry-Ark) Project in the Arkansas <br />demands is shown in Figure 5-9. As can be seen, Basin were developed to address a portion of the water <br />agricultural use is expected to still comprise the majority shortages in these basins. <br />of these uses in 2030. <br />Current: <br />~~ <br />~J~~a <br />Statew~itle Water Supply Inii'iative <br />5-14 S:\REPORT\WORD PROCESSING\REPORT\SS 11-7-04.DOC <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.