|
Section 5
<br />Projected Water Use
<br />Table 5-7 Estimate of
<br />Adams 9,600
<br />Arapahoe 0
<br />Boulder 2,900
<br />Clear Creek NE
<br />Denver 2,400
<br />Eagle NE
<br />Garfield NE
<br />Grand NE
<br />Gunnison NE
<br />Larimer 5,200
<br />Mesa NE
<br />Moffat 11.50(
<br />Montrose 1,900
<br />Morgan 5,900
<br />Pitkin NE
<br />Pueblo 9,000
<br />Routt 2,700
<br />San Miquel NE
<br />Annual SSI Water Use in 2000 and 2030 bv Countv and User
<br />9,600 0
<br />0 0
<br />2,900 400
<br />NE 400
<br />2,400 0
<br />NE 400
<br />NE 400 1
<br />NE 1,200 ~
<br />NE 300
<br />0
<br />400
<br />0
<br />0
<br />NE 2,000
<br />17,800 0
<br />7,600 300
<br />NE 400
<br />NE 1,500
<br />7,400 0
<br />0 NE NE
<br />0 NE NE
<br />600 NE NE
<br />600 NE NE
<br />600
<br />1,900
<br />500
<br />0
<br />600
<br />0
<br />600
<br />0
<br />0
<br />0
<br />3,200
<br />0
<br />600
<br />600
<br />3,700
<br />0
<br />TOTAL 54,200 95,800 8,100 14,100
<br />NE = no estimate
<br />Note: Counties not shown are not expected to have significant SSI use.
<br />NE NE
<br />NE NE
<br />NE NE
<br />YampalWhite/Green ~",~,JT) 20%
<br />22~300 ~ y South aiatte
<br />- 76%_ ; ~~~ ~ 409,700
<br />coio.aao 53%
<br />r 61,90Qr 7 ~ ~_
<br />NE NE
<br />Gunnison
<br />14~,9f0/0 l,
<br />7L~/0 ~ A~ Arkansas
<br />Dolores antl~ ~'- 98 QQQ
<br />San Juan ~ ~~ Rio Grande 0
<br />L~, 38 /o
<br />~ 4,300
<br />25%
<br />Figure 5-7
<br />Projected Increase in Combined Gross M&I
<br />and SSI Demand (AFI~ and Percent
<br />/ncrease from 2000 to 2~43~ by Basin
<br />High and low estimates were also developed around the
<br />baseline M&I and SSI water use projections described
<br />above. Results of the high and low analysis are
<br />presented on a basin basis in Figure 5-8. These values
<br />represent the range of demands that might be expected
<br />to occur in each basin in 2030, as explained in more
<br />~S~
<br />Stolew~ide Woter S~pply Iniliative
<br />detail in Appendix E. Enhanced conservation efforts that
<br />could further reduce the "low" water use projections were
<br />considered in the options evaluation phase as described
<br />in Sections 8 through 10.
<br />2,100 3,900 13,500 23,000 9,500
<br />NE NE 1,900 3,900 2,000
<br />NE NE 5,900 13,900 8,000
<br />NE NE 2,000 3,200 1,200
<br />49,400 49,400 58,500 67,300 8,800
<br />2,800 5,600 5,800 13,800 8,000
<br />NE NE 400 600 200
<br />NE NE 1,500 3,700 2,200
<br />NE NE 3,100 7,400 4,300
<br />106,700 111,300 169,000 221,400 52,400
<br />0
<br />0 1,400,000
<br />N ^Minimum
<br />~ ~~2~~~~00 """""""""""""""""' ^Baseline
<br />~ ^Marimum
<br />~ 1,OOQ000 ---------------------------------- ------
<br />N
<br />R 8~~~~ ________________________________ ______'
<br />~LL
<br />~, a soo,ooo --------------------------------- ------
<br />~
<br />'a 400,000 -- ----------------------------- ------•
<br />c
<br />R
<br />,~ 200,000 ----------------------------- ------
<br />~
<br />H -
<br />H
<br />0
<br />C9 ya5 aa° ~e` yoc a~e cae a~e eeO
<br />~ao G°~oc ~~, °~~ Q~ ~~a Q~ \~c
<br />~~a yac~ ~o ~o~r ~o yo~,r Q~~e
<br />5ac ya~
<br />~r`
<br />~`o` Figure 5-8
<br />Range of Potential Gross M&I and SS/ Water Use in 2030
<br />~~
<br />9,600 9,600 0
<br />0 0 0
<br />3,300 3,600 300
<br />400 600 200
<br />2,400 2,400 0
<br />400 600 200
<br />400 600 200 ~
<br />1,200 1,900 700
<br />300 500 200
<br />i2,400 52,400 0
<br />400 600 200
<br />S:\REPORT\WORD PROCESSING\REPORT\SS 11-7-04.DOC 5-13
<br />
|