Laserfiche WebLink
Section 5 <br />Projected Water Use <br />supplies, timing of deliveries, delivery losses, and <br />application efficiencies. The ability to use agricultural <br />water rights existing on the land to meet the needs of <br />M&I use as the land is developed is highly dependent <br />upon these factors, plus the need for a portion of the <br />water to be stored to meet non-irrigation M&I demands <br />and to provide for firm yield for below average runoff <br />years. These considerations are explained in greater <br />detail in Section 8. <br />5.2 Estimated 2000 and Projected <br />2030 M&I and SSI Use <br />Of the many factors affecting M&I water use, the <br />projected increases in population clearly drive the <br />increases in M&I use from 2000 to 2030. The effects of <br />Level 1 conservation result in a projected reduction in per <br />capita M&I water use of approximately 6 percent over <br />this 30-year planning period. This reduction is reflected in <br />the 2030 M&I water use projections presented in this <br />section. M&I and SSI water use projections presented in <br />this section represent the gross or total diversion <br />amount, as opposed to the consumptively-used portion <br />as described in Section 5.1.1.6. <br />To reiterate, M&I projections were developed by <br />multiplying the estimated (2000) or projected (2030) <br />populations by per capita demands for each of the state's <br />64 counties, then reducing water use associated with <br />Table 5-6 Su <br />Arkansas <br />Colorado <br />Dolores/San Juan/San <br />Gunnison <br />North Platte <br />Rio Grande <br />Yampa/VVhite/Green <br />TOTAL <br />~~ <br />Level 1 conservation measures for the 2030 scenario. <br />These results were aggregated on a basin basis, as well <br />as on a subbasin basis for use in the water supply "gap <br />analysis" as presented in Section 6. <br />Overall, combined M&I and SSI gross water use is <br />~xp~ct~d to increase statewide by about 53 percent <br />(630,000 AFY) over 2000 levels by 2030, as shown in <br />Table 5-6. These projections do not include the impacts <br />of water conservation efforts beyond Level 1 that are <br />being implemented or planned by many M&I providers. <br />These future conservation efforts, as described in <br />Sections 6 and 8, are important strategies for meeting <br />future water demands. The increase in M&I and SSI <br />water use over this period by basin, and relative <br />(percent) increase over 2000 M&I water use, are each <br />presented in Figure 5-7. A summary of projected SSI <br />water uses by type of industry and by county is provided <br />in Table 5-7. <br />Similar to the population patterns described earlier in this <br />section, rates of M&I water use increases over the <br />30-year planning period are generally higher for the West <br />Slope basins than for the Front Range's South Platte and <br />Arkansas Basins. However, the bulk of the increase in <br />water uses in terms ofAFYwill be in the South Platte <br />and Arkansas Basins, which together represent about <br />80 percent of the total projected increase in Colorado's <br />gross M&I and SSI demands. <br />Gross Water Use for M&I and SSI in 2000 and 2030 <br />61 <br />500 600 600 - 100 <br />17,400 23,100 21,700 1,400 4,300 <br />72,400 1,250,800 1,182,100 68,700 409,700 <br />101 <br />~J~~a <br />Statew~itle Water Supply Inii'iative <br />5-12 S:\REPORT\WORD PROCESSING\REPORT\SS 11-7-04.DOC <br />