My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
S5_11-15-04
CWCB
>
SWSI
>
DayForward
>
S5_11-15-04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/26/2010 9:24:17 AM
Creation date
1/10/2008 10:54:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
SWSI
Basin
Statewide
Title
SWSI Phase 1 Report - Section 5 Projected Water Use
Date
11/15/2004
Author
CWCB
SWSI - Doc Type
Final Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Section 5 <br />Projected Water Use <br />Second, the lack of available physical supply can also be <br />a factor that contributes to the calculation of water <br />shortage. For example, a ranch may irrigate hay <br />meadows from a number of small streams running <br />through the ranch. These small streams will normally dry <br />up in late summer, resulting in a lack of available supply <br />even though the water right may be in priority. Additional <br />water supplies could be put to beneficial use if water <br />were available. Shortages as a result of the priority of <br />water rights and the lack of physical supply could <br />potentially be reduced if additional storage were <br />developed to supplement existing supplies. <br />A third factor that contributes to water shortage <br />calculations results from irrigation practices. These <br />calculated shortages are attributable to farming <br />operational practices, where farmers choose to cease <br />irrigation before the end of the growing season. In other <br />words, the shortages are by choice rather than due to <br />water availability. For example, irrigation may cease for <br />the season in late July or early August, <br />even though water supplies may be <br />available. This is to allow hay to be cut, <br />dried, and baled. The theoretical need <br />for water remains, and additional <br />application of water would result in <br />additional CU. This type of water <br />shortage cannot be reduced through <br />additional water supplies and has not <br />been further evaluated. <br />For the basins having DSS tools, water <br />districts that have significant water <br />shortages resulting from the relative <br />priority of the water rights or lack of <br />physical supply have been identified. A <br />more detailed description of the <br />methodology for evaluating these <br />shortages can be found in Appendix F. <br />Figure 5-10 shows those basins that <br />have been determined to have <br />significant water shortages as described <br />above. Based on the prevalence of calls <br />J~~a <br />$~ole'ri~ice Wo~e' $upplY Initia~ive <br />throughout the entire Arkansas and South Platte Basins, <br />even during average year streamflow conditions, <br />widespread agricultural water shortages can be <br />expected. In the North Platte Basin, Basin Roundtable <br />participants indicated a need to firm up agricultural <br />supplies. Although there is no DSS for the North Platte <br />Basin, agricultural shortages can be expected. <br />Generally, the cost of water development exceeds the <br />ability of agriculture to pay for the development of <br />additional water supplies. As a result, it may not be <br />practical or cost-effective to attempt to develop water <br />supply alternatives for areas having agricultural water <br />shortages unless multi-purpose projects could be <br />developed. Section 10 lists potential options for reducing <br />agricultural shortages that have been identified during <br />the process. Funding and ability to pay must be <br />addressed if any of these projects are to be developed. <br /><~ yyy 54 76 <br />/ <br />56~ 55~ %A 48 ~3 ~ ~ <br />_, <br />64 <br />r ai _-i ~ ~ <br />. <br />.. <br />mp <br />t S <br />ring <br />St <br />~ <br />~ <br />q <br />ea <br />oa <br />p <br />s <br />~ 57 <br />4 <br />~ 58 <br />i <br />` <br />~ <br />so ~ <br />. <br />5 ~ <br />65 <br />~ 4(3 '~/ 5'I 6 ~2 <br />~'.... <br />~ \ 53 ~ <br />~ <br />..., <br />~ 52 <br />7 ._ <br />. De` er <br />39 ~ <br />36 <br />9 <br />Glenwood Spr~ings <br />70 37 <br />~ <br />45 f <br />80 <br />$ <br />nJ ~ 38 _ <br />49 <br />Grand Ju cti <br />`~ <br />~ 23 <br />_~ <br />73 ti J :. <br />~ <br />qy~ 40 /~- ~~ ~ Colorado Springs <br />~ <br />• <br />` <br />~~ <br />~,. ~ 59 , <br />~ ~10 - <br />~ <br />~ <br />Montrbse . ~~ <br />1 <br />41 ~ ~ ~ <br />' 2 ~', <br /> <br />) <br />~ <br />28 - ' ~-~ PuAblo~ <br />61 ~ <br />~ <br />~ <br />sa~, 68 62 26 ) a4 ,7 <br />~ 67 <br />25 13 <br />~ ~ <br />69 15 j <br />27 / <br />v~ 79~/ r <br />71 2 "_~ <br />32 -~ 30 Alamosa 16 <br />ngo 31 78 35 18 r~ <br />Dura <br />~ <br />34 33 ~, 29 21 f~ :~V 9~ 66 <br />~~ ~ 46 _ ,.~ 77 22 ~ 24 - <br />- Streams C3 Non-DSS Basins with Anticipated Widespread Agricultural Water Shortages <br />• Cities a Water District Wth Average Agricultural Water Shortages >= 10 % '-°~LCJO <br />C3 Water District with Average Agricultural Wa[er Shortages < 10 % Q <br />~ River Baslns ~ Water Distnctwith Possible Agricultural Water Shortages ~~,~~u~M~~~~ <br />Figure 5-10 <br />Summary of Agricultural Water Shortages by Water District <br />~~ <br />S:\REPORT\WORD PROCESSING\REPORT\SS 11-7-04.DOC 5-15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.