Laserfiche WebLink
Executive Summary <br />Table ES-5 Potential Benefits and Issues of Families of Options for Resolving Supply and Demand Gaps <br />~ • 9 e ! ° p # : :~+~. <br /> <br />Conservation Options <br />Active Municipal & Industrial Conservation ^ Implementation costs can be significantly ~. May result in demand hardening and <br />Measures lower than new water supply development decrease supply reliabiliiy if conserved <br /> ^ No permit requirements to implement water is used for new growth and water <br />Examples: ^ Implementation is within control of the restrictions are needed during droughts <br />. Metering water provider and does not require . Customers may be unwilling to accept <br />. Increasing water rate pricing approval of other entities mandated conservation measures <br />^ Rebates for efficient water using ^ No new diversions required from rivers or ^ Impacts on utiliiy revenues as a result of <br />appliances streams reduced demand <br />^ Incentives for reducing high water use ^ Can stretch existing supplies ^ Loss of return flow credits that must be <br />landscaping ^ Potential water qualiiy benefits replaced with other sources <br />^ Restrictions on amount of lawn area ^ Lesser environmental impacts than new ^ May not increase supplies for providers <br /> storage with augmentation plans if they receive full <br /> ^ Can reduce water and wastewater credit for all return flows <br /> treatrnent, distribution, and collection ^ Some urban water providers may be at a <br /> capital and operations and maintenance high level of conservation <br /> costs <br />Agricultural Efficiency Measures ^ Can stretch existing supplies ^ Loss of return flows may impact <br /> ^ May reduce non-crop consumptive use downstream water rights and environment <br />Examples: . Potential water qualiiy benefits . Ability to pay <br />^ Ditch lining ^ No new diversions required from rivers or ^ Water rights limitations, cannot sell or <br />^ Conversion of flood irrigation to gated pipe streams transfer salvaged or saved water <br />. Installation of sprinklers . No permit requirements to implement . Potential compact issues <br /> ^ May increase downstream calls <br /> ^ May result in an unauthorized increase in <br /> CU in historically water short systems <br /> ^ May impact groundwater tables and wells <br /> in the area <br />Agricultural Transfers <br />Permanent Agricultural Transfer ^ Permanent water right ^ Local socio-economic impacts as a result <br /> ^ Usually more senior water rights with of dry-up of agricultural lands <br />The acquisition of agricultural water rights greater reliability and less storage required ^ Dry-land has a substantially lower <br />and the cessation of irrigation on these to produce a firm annual yield assessed value than irrigated agricultural <br />historically irrigated lands. Water rights are ^ Simpler permitting than a new reservoir land, which affects local tax revenue <br />transferred to other uses. storing new water rights ^ Water court procedure required to change <br /> ^ Does not increase depletions within the the use of agricultural water rights <br /> basin ^ Revegetation of lands to be dried up <br /> ^ Return flows from the historic consumptive required under certain circumstances <br /> use are consumable and can be reused ^ Potential loss of open space <br /> ^ Lesser environmental impacts than a new ^ Potential loss of wetlands and riparian <br /> water storage project habitat <br /> ^ Approximately 3 AF of storage is required <br /> to produce 1 AF of firm annual yield for M&I <br /> use <br /> ^ May impact groundwater tables and wells <br /> in the area unless historical returns are <br /> made in the exact location <br />J~~a <br />$~ole'ri~ice Wo~e' $upplY Initia~ive <br />~~ <br />S:\REPORT\WORD PROCESSING\REPORT\EXEC SUMMARY 11-10-04.DOC ES-31 <br />