My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GunnisonComments06
CWCB
>
SWSI
>
DayForward
>
GunnisonComments06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 10:32:38 AM
Creation date
1/7/2008 11:15:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
SWSI
Basin
Gunnison
Title
Comments 6
Date
3/2/2004
SWSI - Doc Type
Comments
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Colorado River Water Conservation District Statewide Water Supply Jnitiative Interests Statement <br />Page 6 of 11 <br /> <br />Description: The three Summit County resort areas, Keystone~ Breckenridge and Frisco/Copper <br />Mountain continue to develop, increasing both the winter demands for domestic use and <br />snowmakingJ as well as enhancing the summer economy through the creation of more golf courses. <br />This has stretched the Summit County Augmentation Plan heavily, and additional, small amounts of <br />supplies are needed in each of the basins if this rate of development is to continue. The UPCO <br />process has identified shortages in various stream reaches, and these need to be further evaluated. <br /> <br />Ri ver District Interests vis a vis SWSI: <br />1. Foster additional water supplies in Summit County for in-basin uses. <br /> <br />2. See also Tl\ID section. <br /> <br />3. See also Overall section. <br /> <br />East Grand County <br /> <br />Description: East Grand County, from Granby to Berthoud Pass, is also an area that is converting <br />from Front Range day skiers to a year round residential resort community; with increasing demands <br />for golf course inigation, as well as sufficient water for domestic consumptive uses, waste water <br />dilution flows and environmental flows. Shortages have been identified through the UPCO process <br />for a number of reaches in this area. Cooperation with both Denver Water and NCWCD with <br />regards to their system expansions will be critical. <br /> <br />River District Interests vis a vis SWSI: <br /> <br />Foster additional water supplies in Grand County for in-basin uses. <br /> <br />1. See also Tl\ID section+ <br />2. See also Overall section. <br />3~ Plateau Creek Storage <br /> <br />Desen t;>tion: Ute Water Conservancy District, the major supplier of treated, domestic water in the <br />growth area in the Grand Valley, may have long term needs for additional storage in Plateau Creek, <br />their principal water sourcet This compounds the problem with the "15 Mile Reach", as this water, <br />even though it is not 100% consumptive, is 100% consumptive to that stretch of river. This area, <br />however, will represent the majority of the full time growth in the Colorado River main stem, and the <br />SWSI process needs to recognize this as a significant local area need. <br /> <br />River District Interests vis a vis SWSI: <br /> <br />1. Foster additional water supplies for Ute Water Conservancy District. <br /> <br />2. Ensure that Ute's development of additional water does not run afoul of the Recovery <br />Program and the I5-Mile Reach PBO. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.