Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Rio Grande Basin Roundtable Technical Meeting #4 <br />Meeting Summary <br /> <br />The high, low and average results for the objective weighting in the Rio Grande Basin was <br />presented, as well as the relative occurrence of each option being among the top 5 most <br />preferred choice for each basin roundtable member. <br /> <br />Rick Brown reviewed the alternatives development in regards to environmental and <br />recreational uses, M&I and SS-I needs, and agricultural needs. <br /> <br />Feedback from the BRT members on the development of alternatives follows. <br /> <br />. Under the groundwater management rules, what would be the sources of augmentation? <br />. Arsenic in drinking water - perhaps blending may be possible vs. arsenic treatment with <br />other higher quality sources. <br />. Does the SWSI team need to add any specificity to alternatives? The valley has a pretty good <br />handle on options and feels they can move forward. It is helpful to keep the public involved. <br />. Terrace Reservoir - no firm plans at this time, but with money it could improve the yield. <br />Possible environmental benefit. <br />. Continental has had a significant amount of money invested without reducing seepage. <br />. Unsustainable pumping - do sub-Districts need support? Yes, CWCB could assist with loans <br />and possible "pilot project" grants. <br />. Current range of overdraft should be up to lOOK AF depending on hydrology and snowpack. <br />Source of overdraft varies depending on where you are in the valley. <br />. M&I needs to be careful in how they view growth and growth potential relative to long-term <br />hydrology - growing in the wet years can create a false sense of security. <br />. Responsibility to M&I rate paying customers also affects the attractiveness of conservation. <br />. Issue is not efficiency, in agricultural efficiency it is consumptive use <br />. Remember agriculture water provides secondary benefits (i.e., ecosystem enhancement, <br />wildlife habitat). <br />. Interruptible transfer - during 2002 drought, there was such a low flow the yield for M&I was <br />very limited. <br />. Storage must be constructed even for permanent agricultural transfer (slide 81). <br />. SWSI may want to develop curves of runoff for average year versus drought year to show <br />that dry year leasing has limited yield (part of "water myths" fact sheet). <br />. Control of non-native phreatophytes can cause significant short-term impacts from removal <br />and longer term impacts to downstream native vegetation and ecosystems. <br />. Slide 85 NRCS EQIP, CREPS would be associated with ground and surface water <br />conservation. <br />. Add Alamosa River Restoration Project to slide 85. <br />. Allowing for storage of transmountain waters would allow greater utilization and more <br />flexibility in managing the water portfolio. <br />. Platoro is operated under decree to do more than that - correct slide "minimum" flows. It's a <br />desired level of flow, not minimum. Add "and" to "prevent daily flow." <br />. It takes money to provide enhancements. <br />. Icing causes extreme flow variation (Slide 86) <br />. When making required deliveries it seems "reasonable" to be flexible on flow regime. <br /> <br />CDIVI <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />Rio Grande BRT Mtg #4 Summary.doc 11/29/2004 <br />