My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Rio_Grande_BRT_Mtg_4_Summary
CWCB
>
SWSI
>
DayForward
>
Rio_Grande_BRT_Mtg_4_Summary
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 10:33:13 AM
Creation date
1/4/2008 11:03:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
SWSI
Basin
Rio Grande
Title
Meeting Summary 4
Date
8/19/2004
SWSI - Doc Type
Summaries
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Rio Grande Basin Roundtable Technical Meeting #4 <br />Meeting Summary <br /> <br />. Money should be provided to users/water rights holders if you wish to change project yield. <br />. DOW has paid to provide for permanent pools and they should be acknowledged for being <br />proactive and a good neighbor. <br />. Level 3 and 4 conservation - the highest consumptions are from non-native trees that are <br />adapted to wet environment so the removal of non-native tree canopies must be removed. <br />This is a quality of life issue. <br />. Keeping your living space cooler (trees) reduces other energy demands (i.e., air <br />conditioning). <br />. Future growth may need to be more conscious of our semi-arid/ arid climate. <br />. Be clear about efficiency vs. consumptive use. <br />. Place range of costs on meeting 2030 needs and report to legislature - 600 KAF need X $/ AF. <br />. Term limits affect knowledge of legislators. <br /> <br />1m plementation <br /> <br />Rick Brown and Kelly DiNatale went through the implementation issues and challenges in <br />employing various water management strategies. There are various state and federal loan and <br />grant sources available. <br /> <br />SWSI Wrap-Up <br /> <br />The major findings of SWSI and final report preparation and schedule were reviewed by Rick <br />Brown. The roundtable members were reminded that the final SWSI report will be presented at <br />the November 16-17, 2004 Board Meeting in Denver (location TBD). Feedback on the SWSI <br />project was asked of all BRT members. <br /> <br />Public Meeting and Comments <br /> <br />A separate public meeting was held at 6:30. The SWSI team gave an interactive presentation on <br />the SWSI process and findings to date. All public attendees at the BRT meeting were offered an <br />opportunity to comment. <br /> <br />. Israel has advanced sub surface irrigation; this technology should be considered here. <br />. Aurora is paying for drip systems in the Arkansas Basin and drying up a portion of the land. <br />. Need to understand impacts of all water supply options. <br />. Concern over impacts to agriculture. <br />. Homeowner Associations shouldn't require bluegrass. <br />. Rio Grande Basin cannot afford the cost to solve over-pumping issues. <br />. Public education is important. <br />. Once 20-30% of wells in the basin go dry, irrigated acres will decline and aquifer will recover. <br />. Rio Grande Basin growth rate seems low; much of the growth is in the South Fork and <br />Crestone areas. <br /> <br />CDIVI <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />Rio Grande BRT Mtg #4 Summary.doc 11/29/2004 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.