My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD11206
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
DayForward
>
1
>
FLOOD11206
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2010 10:12:17 AM
Creation date
12/28/2007 3:51:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Jefferson
Arapahoe
Basin
South Platte
Title
Chatfield Reallocation Study: Meeting Minutes 11/06/2007
Date
11/6/2007
Prepared For
Meeting Participants
Prepared By
CWCB
Floodplain - Doc Type
Meeting Summary
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />be anything above zero. That is the assumption on cost break as of now. Asked him if <br />we could consider average, said to take to district, Eric and I agreed to write up proposal <br />based on average yield, a 2/3 yield, rather than a 5/6 break. <br /> <br />? (sitting by window): Waste water form Castle Pines considered? Not native yield. <br />Return Flow Water? <br /> <br />Bob: Tracy Beauvette had a conversation about this, instream benefits, there is some <br />kind of proration on the cost there. <br /> <br />Tom: This is a separate issue. <br /> <br />Anne: Losing some water when Roxborough's waste water goes down the pipes, how <br />much is that? <br /> <br />Larry: That has only been happening for a couple of years, shouldn't be considered. <br /> <br />Anne: That should be worked out. <br /> <br />Larry: Virtually a non-issue. <br /> <br />Anne: Castle Pines - is that a long term issue. <br /> <br />Britta(?): Different portfolio of water rights, Corps is only providing the space. <br /> <br />Tom: But the use of the space is what we are trying to get at, hydrologic cycle, what <br />would that see.. <br /> <br />Kevin: An actual water yield? <br /> <br />Tom: We have been hanging our hat on that average yield of@7K AF per year, if we <br />could do this on this amount, a mechanism to get a break on the cost of storage, based <br />upon info we have available to us. <br /> <br />Britta (Next to Rod): Everyone wants that, but that might translate into some kind of a <br />hook Corps has, that says on average, there can only be this much water in it, or there's <br />some sort of consequence. <br /> <br />Tom: Avoid any strings that might be attached. <br /> <br />Marge: May have to be reviewed every 5 years. There have been some instances where <br />cost of storage was reviewed for a specific project, you need to keep that in mind and see <br />what the window may be. <br /> <br />David: It was a good trip, something the coalition will want to continue to do, got to get <br />through the ROD and see where you are at that point. I want to point out heads up, we've <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.