FLOOD11195 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

- 2 - o Wildlife - working on Preble's meadow jumping mouse impacts and Fish and Wildlife Service issues and request for information. They will be developing a schedule on how to interact with Pete Plage informally and formally for the Programmatic Biological Opinion. o Wetlands - Looking at extent of impacts to migratory birds with an emphasis on wooded riparian habitat. Audubon Society provided bird databases that have proved useful and hel pful. o Water Quality - Dave Jensen reviewed the model, adjustments on the assumptions made more E. Coli data added. Next step is to send out report to WQ group. o Discharge/Flood Damages - Chuck Hillerson received water surface profiles but still is working to determine where to start damage assessment in various areas. There are 2-year through 500-year flood profiles. Downstream to baseline road. Chuck will look at costs associated with different alternatives. Cost of using Chatfield vs. cost of not using Chatfield. There is guess work in the no action alternative but the Corps needs the "best estimates". This information will be in Chapter 2 and 5. o Recreation Impacts - the costs of whatever mitigation is required will be included in the cost of reallocation calculation. . Chapter 6 - Public involvement, review and consultation. Marty has received comments and is collating. . Rare Plant Surveys - Tetra Tech is making revisions to preliminary draft per Corps comments; draft report to the Corps in a week or two. Corps will send out to USFWS and the state for reVl ew. . 404 Permit - Tom Browning asked about the need for a section 404 permit. There is no fill so no section 404 permit needed. Even if there is no 404 permit we still have a NEP A review of impacts on wetlands. . Reservoir Operational Model - Joel Knofczysnki is in the process of writing the final report for the reservoir operational model. This report will be part of the appendixes. . Schedule - Rick McLoud confirmed that Chapter 2 is seven weeks behind and the water quality effort is behind but can be absorbed without schedule slippage at this point. . Reservoir Operational Plan - Kent Wiley asked if this would be included in the FR/EIS. Marty explained that there will be a revision to the water management plan for the reservoir but not part of the FR/EIS. Recreation Impact Miti2ation Study (State Parks) . EDA W has finished their analysis but will not publish the study or report back to the group until the findings are presented to the State Parks Board in mid June. There are concerns of only having monthly storage instead of daily storage accounting. . Earlier EDA W report (2004) was prior to the new Corps policy on structures within the 100-year flood pool. They will have to look at the Phase I study and facilities from that study to see how they look. The swim beach materials and design and location might be different based on pool fluctuations and sighting above the 100-year flood pool requirements. . Tetra Tech needs the recreation impact analysis for parts of the FR/EIS report analyses and write up by July 1 to stay on schedule. . The State Parks study will put a price tag on mitigation and alternatives. There is a question is the swim beach mitigation could even occur at the reservoir. It may need to be moved based on fluctuations. Flood Protection . Water Project Planning and Finance. Stream and Lake Protection Water Supply Protection. Conservation Planning