My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD11172
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
DayForward
>
1
>
FLOOD11172
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2010 10:12:14 AM
Creation date
12/28/2007 3:41:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Jefferson
Arapahoe
Basin
South Platte
Title
Chatfield Reallocation Study: Agenda 06/17/2007
Date
6/17/2007
Prepared For
Meeting Participants
Prepared By
CWCB
Floodplain - Doc Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />The Record of Decision must be developed and executed prior to the water contracts <br />being signed by USACE and CWCB. Therefore, the critical path to wet water clearly <br />includes the expedient completion of the project FRlEIS. <br /> <br />Our Focus: <br /> <br />The focus of the local political coalition is therefore to keep the FRlEIS simplified to the <br />extent possible to support the decision to create a joint flood control-conservation pool <br />that CWCB would contract for with local water users based on: <br /> <br />. WRDA 1986 authorization for municipal and industrial water supply, agriculture and <br />recreation and fishery habitat protection; <br />. Colorado water law; and <br />. EIS identified recreational and environmental impacts. <br /> <br />Simplification should include: <br /> <br />. Simple handling of the agricultural water issue (given Sec. 931 ofWRDA 1986); and <br />. Simple handling of the reservoir hydrology, in a manner consistent with the FWS <br />position (i.e. nature and frequency of the reservoir fluctuations does not substantially <br />impact the identification of environmental impacts). <br /> <br />Therefore the local political coalition and the CWCBneeds: <br /> <br />. Example RODs in hard copy to indicate current precedence regarding reallocation <br />"actions" (including who at USACE executes the ROD); and <br />. Staff assignments to the IWR that understand and will assist us with the key issues. <br /> <br />We also need: <br /> <br />. Messaging that USACE Omaha District requires appropriate funding levels to support <br />local needs; <br />. Understanding of current WRDA bill as it relates to aspects of the Chatfield FRlEIS; <br />and <br />. Grounding on our understanding of the overall project schedule and milestones for <br />funding and project design, construction, and overview. <br /> <br />The meetings are scheduled such that the USACE HQ meeting is first, and the delegation <br />meetings follow. In this way we can inform the delegation staff regarding the project <br />funding and progress, as appropriate. <br /> <br />The coalition's solid support for the Chatfield project and commitment is to stay the <br />course. The coalition's intent is to support the Corps' needs in completing this project <br />with all due speed. <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.