My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Sept 11 South PlatteMinutes
CWCB
>
Basin Roundtables
>
DayForward
>
Sept 11 South PlatteMinutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 4:58:16 PM
Creation date
12/14/2007 3:39:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Basin Roundtables
Basin Roundtable
South Platte
Title
September 07 Minutes
Date
9/11/2007
Basin Roundtables - Doc Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Education committee has some money left and will get another appropriation... open to <br />ideas on how to educate roundtable members. <br />Complement to presentation for South Platte Basin: excellent: Fred, Bob, Bill. Right on <br />point, caught attention of the IBCC members, demonstrated that we take the stewardship <br />of the South Platte seriously and that we are as efficient as we can be... number one in <br />lowest per capita use and basin efficiency76% of the water in the basin is consumed, <br />that which is not, is reused or is outside our infrastn~cture of capture. Efficiency of ag <br />production within basin and number of dollars generated; this very important as you look <br />at best use. These will be posted on the South Platte Basin website by the end of the <br />week. <br />Fred Walker: Sasha Charney from Boulder County Open Space really put the <br />presentation together. She really did it all and we rearranged and added some slides, but <br />she deserves a "job well done." <br />Eric: RE: consumptive and non-consumptive needs analysis: consensus that there needs <br />to be a common technical platform to look at consumptive and non-consumptive and <br />what drives this platform; re: in-stream flows-where they are needed, what are <br />"attributes"-what areas, what stream reaches, what areas are deserving of protection, <br />how to deternune what is needed; concern was expressed by Senator Isgar and others <br />concerning this info being used in a regulatory context: ie: if there is an attribute <br />identified that a basin would like protected...how would that prioritization affect a <br />project's approval; some concern here. Conclusion: needs to be a check back to the <br />IBCC from the roundtables so that there will be a conullonality of these efforts. <br />RE: discussion about looking at moving forward with conceptual solutions; IBCC's <br />willingness to move forward with solutions to water needs as early as possible. <br />CWBC: Meeting next week in Grand Junction; meeting of finance committee to look at <br />projects bills for coming fiscal year; Board takes action in November; 18 applications for <br />state wide fiends; also 14-18 applications for basin-wide funds; this will be time <br />consuming. <br />Fred Walker: WSRA Applications: There are no potential applicants tonight. <br />Harold Evans: RE: Jim Hall application to support data logging and telemetry for <br />diversion structures on the South Platte; discussion re: need for how to increase <br />efficiency of water use, better utilization of excess augmentation credits; one thing that <br />affects this is real time data; we will want to support this because if we have better data <br />on this use water resources better; this was discussed on South Platte Task Force <br />Eric: comment: Lower, Northern and State Engineer started a comprehensive program in <br />District 1 and District 64 to put telemetry for diversions; this has made an appreciable <br />difference. Tlus info is forwarded to state engineer's office and is accessible to anyone; <br />we want to move this down to District 2 and to entire South Platte. <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.