Laserfiche WebLink
support infrastn~cture and services we need-could be more interestinb more vitalstagnant <br />economy-other commuiuties with more robust growth have more employment and more <br />services-won't have needed growth to have viable commuiuty for optimal-also tying up water <br />in this use is actually against the public policy of Colorado which gives priority to domestic <br />use just because you have acquired rights to agricultural use and put into anon-profit crop <br />doesn't mean that someone can't come take it. <br />Mike - re other uses of waterprivate property riglrtCE ties water to that land-decision of <br />landowner not non-profit which holds CE -Water right is a property right-can be sold -still a <br />free market <br />Dale- not stopping development -there is and will be plenty of development possible <br />Mike-suggested that if people don't like infrastructure in SLV-can go somewhere else where <br />they exist! <br />Raystanding up for Fred abit-had this discussionshares hope for a lot of good paying job <br />but look around the state at places such as Crested Butte-the economy is building second <br />homes and taking care of second home owners but many locals can no longer afford to live <br />thereRGI is not contrary to growth or private property rights-it's a market based decision and <br />important to all water users to protect the river corridor-from many policy positions it doesn't <br />make sense to build houses along the river anyway. <br />Doub has been on the land use committee in Rio Grande County-have some developers who <br />want to make the biggest bucks as fast as possible-some developers see other patterns of <br />development that can continue to sustain the river corridor-let river fiinction and wildlife <br />habitat intact and jobs and economic development can come from tourism and recreation over <br />long termvs developers that impact the river negatively. <br />Ed Nielsen-moved to support the application and reconunend funding <br />Steve Vandiver 2"~ <br />All in favor except one-Fred Bauder <br />DINNER BREAK <br />6. Report of Non-Consumptive Use Committee <br />Rio de la Vista and Nicole Rowan (of CDM) reported on the meeting earlier in the day of the <br />SLV Wetlands Focus Area Conunittee. This group is serving as the Nonconsumptive Needs <br />Assessment Committee for the Roundtable. With Nicole's assistance, the Commttee is pulling <br />together a list of various data bases and GIS information regarding all nonconsumptive attributes <br />for the Rio Grande Basinincluding wildlife, wetlands, plant surveys, etc. Once this is <br />developed, it will be posted on the RGWCD website for the Roundtable member's review. <br />Tlus will further help identify where data gaps nught exist, so that if additional information is <br />needed and vital to future decisions, we can find ways to fill those gaps. <br />Rio Grande Basile Roundtable-Meeting Miliutes Jul~T 14, 2007 Page 4 <br />