My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
25d (2)
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
25d (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:37:47 PM
Creation date
12/4/2007 11:12:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
11/18/2007
Description
CWCB Director's Report
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
133
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
-21- <br />Sharp said if the Lower Basin states "triggered a curtailment in the Upper Basin" in other words, <br />demanded their allocated water in a time of shortage, thus cutting off some current water uses in the <br />Upper Basin water users on the Yampa River would be "in a difficult and troubled position." <br />"Virtually all of our storage and industrial development is very junior in priority," Sharp said, describing <br />local water rights that were filed years, if not decades, after water rights in other areas of Colorado and <br />the Upper Basin. <br />Sharp and Isgar acknowledged that state water officials currently are struggling to determine how to even <br />administer a curtailment from the Lower Basin in the event of a shortage. The Colorado Water <br />Conservation Board currently is conducting a study to determine how much water is, in fact, available to <br />meet obligations of the 1922 compact. <br />Isgar said while he does not yet have draft language fora 2008 water bill, there "is a fairly good (chance) <br />that we will come forward with something, letting people know that water rights could be conditioned in <br />the future, based on some criteria." <br />COLORADO CLEAR OF DROUGHT WOES: On the official drought map of the United States, <br />Colorado sits as an island of relative cool-white moisture, surrounded by wide seas of scorched brown <br />and burnt amber from Los Angeles to Atlanta. <br />Timely storms in the past year have combined with a stronger conservation ethic to leave Denver-area <br />water systems flush in the month consumers shut down their sprinklers. <br />With Southern California smoldering and Dixie choking on dust, Colorado water officials take solace in a <br />predicted La Nina forecast for the Pacific Ocean that could bring increased winter stot7ns to the <br />Northwest and keep the Rocky Mountains on the cooler side of the drought map. <br />Yet the 2002 drought and intensified weather swings brought on by global warming leave no room for <br />smugness in the ongoing Colorado water fight. Even the fires in Los Angeles and San Diego can sense as <br />cautions to local water consumers, said Denver Water planner Greg Fisher. Colorado's saturation varies <br />decidedly year to year. <br />Denver, Aurora and other major utilities will use this off season to study and attempt to solidify what they <br />are now calling semi-permanent reductions by consumers. Since the worst of the Colorado drought and <br />wildfires in 2002, utilities have compared each summer's water use to 2001 or earlier levels to gauge <br />behavior changes brought on by price hikes and publicity campaigns. <br />Denver users consumed 21 percent less water through September than they did in pre-drought years. <br />Cuts in use and well-timed snow and rain from May to September left Denver's reservoirs at 93 percent of <br />capacity this fall, compared with 89 percent last year and an 87 percent median over the long term. <br />Consumers in Aurora appear to have cut use by about 19 percent from pre-drought levels, Binney said, <br />though managers have noticed "creep" in the levels of lawn-sprinkling as the city's reservoir situation <br />improved. Aurora's reservoir system is at 84 percent of capacity, a vast improvement over 32 percent in <br />October 2002. <br />Water use dropped by as much as 35 percent during the worst drought years, through a combination of <br />dire public messages, watering restrictions and higher prices. <br />Flood Protection • Water Project Planning and Finance • Stream and Lake Protection <br />Water Supply Protection • Conservation Plarming <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.