Laserfiche WebLink
-20- <br />Water users are concerned, however, that climate change could reduce the amount of water available in <br />future years and have begun preparing for reduced yields from Western Slope water rights. <br />The Colorado River Compact drew up obligations for the Upper Basin states during a wet historic period, <br />but flows have been lower in recent history. Climate models are predicting more frequent droughts than <br />contained in the historic record. <br />"What we're talking about is the last increment, whether it's Aaron Million's project or the Yampa pump- <br />back," said Jim Pokrandt, spokesman for the Colorado River district. "No one can say what that last <br />increment is." <br />The Colorado River District earlier this month cautioned the state against developing curtailment rules on <br />the Colorado River until the Western Slope water availability study is complete. <br />Sen. Jim Isgar-, D-Hesperus, is contemplating legislation next year that would protect senior water rights if <br />there were a call on the Colorado River. A call by Lower Basin states - Arizona, California and Nevada - <br />could curtail diversions and exports in Colorado, and Isgar said the state should be prepared to protect <br />existing water rights before allowing new projects to claim water. <br />Isgar said the water availability study is only the first step, and the information needs to be cranked into <br />criteria on how to manage future flows. <br />Million said that line of thinking is actually putting more pressure on Colorado's water system. Million's <br />request for a contract protects the Green River and has been scaled back to accommodate the Northern <br />district's Yampa project. Million said his project and the state's study of water availability can move <br />ahead at the same time. <br />WATER RIGHTS MAHING WAVES: A Western Slope lawmaker is considering legislation that <br />would give the state of Colorado authority over all future water rights. <br />State Sen. Jim Isgar, D-Hesperus and chairman of the Senate's Agriculture, Natural Resources and <br />Energy Committee, said Friday he might propose a bill in 2008 that would essentially place an asterisk on <br />water rights acquired in Colorado after the bill is signed into law. Such a bill would be intended to ensure <br />that state officials have the first priority to allocate Colorado water if storage levels in reservoirs such <br />as Lake Powell, which straddles the Utah-Arizona border and supplies water for more than 20 million <br />people in the Southwest drop below a certain level. <br />Isgar said the "No. 1 water right" in Colorado is the 1922 Colorado River Compact, which allocates water <br />to seven states in the Colorado River Basin and Mexico. The compact requires the Upper Basin states of <br />Colorado, Utah, Wyoming and New Mexico to send a designated amount of water 75 million acre-feet <br />during any 10-year period to the Lower Basin states of Arizona, California and Nevada. <br />Steamboat Springs' attorney Tom Sharp has served as a director of the Upper Yampa Water Conservancy <br />District since 1977 and chairs the Yampa/White roundtable group, which guides state water action and <br />funding in Northwest Colorado. <br />Sharp said Friday that '`given the drought conditions we have had over the last seven years, there has been <br />a heightened level of concern about the remaining water availability under the compact for Colorado." <br />But despite that concern, Sharp said a bill such as Isgar's would likely drive future water owners to <br />purchase older, unconditional water rights rather than new ones that the state could override. <br />Flood Protection • Water Project Planning and Finance • Stream and Lake Protection <br />Water Supply Protection • Conservation Plarming <br />